From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Fri Apr 1 18:55:58 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 5DEFD358633; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 18:55:58 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from postout1.mail.lrz.de (postout1.mail.lrz.de [129.187.255.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C4033582C8 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 18:55:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lxmhs51.srv.lrz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postout1.mail.lrz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3qc6vw2mNDzyVc; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 18:55:56 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: postout.lrz.de (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)" header.d=lrz.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=lrz.de; h= mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type :content-language:accept-language:in-reply-to:references :message-id:date:date:subject:subject:from:from:received :received:received:received; s=postout; t=1459529756; bh=UbWYOXN akexenKamKp3r0OJenxHpsRXUXvdrv0T/R/Q=; b=IV0209mjjc3t+m6IWSO1xuK 3D2W50yZxzWmtGcyHANm9ypoeX1ZxhBejO128lMH5MnOD4vbyr8yp4Ko3Ji9dezr 1ggv2cxCcPNavrYxNRdTe4yRYdYPXgq++0uBo8HJWNEj9gqFIC3JVULNCU1Pgxth BsdQvdpUh6xoJthKfj2/PLQEvCAfQTGmht5TGIJdZQpCmIoYo+2CGS6s+j/gujRC 0XI5pB6PZ1PrzNWkg81rMmW/X2wlk0vo6fRCZHUweBtC/qvYfrBp39YJwHb6YMys QePYFvcBo/n5D7nva70YDWEgdw6mNo628vAUOPVghMDn7ULbhGg2cYQBnDBn8sw= = X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at lrz.de in lxmhs51.srv.lrz.de X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.885 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.885 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, LRZ_DATE_TZ_0000=0.001, LRZ_DKIM_DESTROY_MTA=0.001, LRZ_DMARC_LRZ_FAIL=0.001, LRZ_DMARC_OVERWRITE=0.001, LRZ_ENVFROM_LRZ_S=0.001, LRZ_FROM_AP_PHRASE=0.001, LRZ_FROM_LRZ_S=0.001, LRZ_FROM_PHRASE=0.001, LRZ_FROM_PRE_SUR_ADDR=0.001, LRZ_FWD_MS_EX=0.001, LRZ_HAS_X_ORIG_IP=0.001, LRZ_MSGID_HL32=0.001, LRZ_MSGID_SPAM_68=0.001, LRZ_RCVD_MS_EX=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from postout1.mail.lrz.de ([127.0.0.1]) by lxmhs51.srv.lrz.de (lxmhs51.srv.lrz.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 20024) with LMTP id Wvq2N_mHnViU; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 18:55:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from BADWLRZ-SWMBX01.ads.mwn.de (BADWLRZ-SWMBX01.ads.mwn.de [IPv6:2001:4ca0:0:108::157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "BADWLRZ-SWMBX01", Issuer "BADWLRZ-SWMBX01" (not verified)) by postout1.mail.lrz.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3qc6vw0WLtzyVZ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 18:55:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from BADWLRZ-SWMBX03.ads.mwn.de (2001:4ca0:0:108::159) by BADWLRZ-SWMBX01.ads.mwn.de (2001:4ca0:0:108::157) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1156.6; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 18:55:55 +0200 Received: from BADWLRZ-SWMBX03.ads.mwn.de ([fe80::7c52:cc37:21a8:1966]) by BADWLRZ-SWMBX03.ads.mwn.de ([fe80::7c52:cc37:21a8:1966%12]) with mapi id 15.00.1156.000; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 18:55:55 +0200 From: "Bader, Reinhold" To: "mexas@bris.ac.uk" , WG5 Subject: AW: AW: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.5693) coarray dummy arguments Thread-Topic: AW: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.5693) coarray dummy arguments Thread-Index: AdGLIjqiwNtJ9t9cQqCzYaSC3aToTwA/vO6AAAUcGQD//+B3AP//3f0A Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 16:55:55 +0000 Message-ID: <64927c48607c458c9c4b15b1c01ac919@BADWLRZ-SWMBX03.ads.mwn.de> References: <87fabdff94d8456fa4a9ca9e0c9ac13f@BADWLRZ-SWMBX03.ads.mwn.de> <201604011650.u31GocW2030610@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <201604011650.u31GocW2030610@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US Content-Language: de-DE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [2001:4ca0:0:f034::1] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk Hello Anton,=20 >=20 > So are you trying to prohibit this? >=20 > program p > integer :: j[*], p > p =3D ... > call s( j[p] ) > end program p >=20 > subroutine s( i ) > integer i > i =3D ... > end subroutine s >=20 No, this is not the scenario under consideration. Bill has already sent in = some comments, including a request for examples that more clearly show the = issues with the current text.=20 The idea is not to change the intended semantics, but to explicitly describ= e missing bits of them in the normative text. When I get around to it, I'll= send in an updated draft. Cheers Reinhold