From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Fri Apr 1 18:17:20 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 5131D3587C0; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 18:17:20 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from mail-wm0-f46.google.com (mail-wm0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72A383582C8 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 18:17:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f46.google.com with SMTP id p65so29126496wmp.0 for ; Fri, 01 Apr 2016 09:17:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bris-ac-uk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:message-id:to:subject:reply-to:in-reply-to; bh=nuGZq9nDbR1nLCfVvIq/VlMO65NATmve429Tc+0GRZw=; b=OQkztgR/E13pXbtjs6M4orbUUWyH6deEBkgNU/MMYNiecfJD8SCyfgGoRPRMGzlEBU zKrBZzCOkLl6ybMPS7wo8A/zRAtoGrp/u8nk9CsqDC3CtFipyLvJMJrS6Qj6RoYrMuvr 16bJHrNPxAGYOclIbcevN2CyWGDUFImwomOqLv3IIjhATiywAr9uVuMEBZhSgxemM93B 08gCovMBr/w7mMe5ga8XW+Ge2Q2wi7LKmAWg+AwVzLEgNzdGcjxqsCwjjM4GZFuY8hVz mx2jI0m7/Y39gKksgSvBxQxLQ2mw2VktZcJXoLp5kIUv+8bkTtHRHpigmXjOHqnE0/r1 zppg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:subject:reply-to :in-reply-to; bh=nuGZq9nDbR1nLCfVvIq/VlMO65NATmve429Tc+0GRZw=; b=WetR5d4F3CgY1eJ0OCFxKbSnUVERAMvC0suQNqC9KT5+UFT++sy+nkTYwc9jcLq72v NVNI61PsuC78Ziv3g8ZlTCsbpIpz4Vjad5lpgsJjAr4c9bR5rsFGkcvGhxWOkcxqKJI6 pO670v7oIq/9AdWdI0QxhEPno36HNfo8GVYZPPUopp45fKlY0CTyFtPK78/2ZMRoRK5J CqE8zZTLPhEPSA5d/3xGM9uUWuDQzRaPqBDa+SYBnEqubSeNNw55ErBdGFkvdm61X7bm hf7baKvxVTsjCFaEu7pYuYAwYpKo9qi/MYX9ZtBeKlh3acXr/c6y5Afw8GLtASe36Cqv Y59w== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJ8XstYS7uOv2fM0NVECtFGGnu2Cm8cJ4F1LPSGv2bxVP5+4C2jvw1NU7iTWBV700w2 X-Received: by 10.194.158.98 with SMTP id wt2mr5782365wjb.102.1459527433183; Fri, 01 Apr 2016 09:17:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk. [137.222.170.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a1sm14721567wje.43.2016.04.01.09.17.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 01 Apr 2016 09:17:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u31GHC1k030453; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 17:17:12 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u31GHBpR030452; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 17:17:11 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas) Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 17:17:11 +0100 (BST) From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201604011617.u31GHBpR030452@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> To: Reinhold.Bader@lrz.de, sc22wg5@open-std.org Subject: Re: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.5693) coarray dummy arguments Reply-To: mexas@bris.ac.uk In-Reply-To: <20160331075716.B092135872B@www.open-std.org> Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk Hi Reinhold [312] After NOTE 12.39 add "NOTE 12.39+1 The exception to above rules for dummy coarrays enables cross-image accesses within procedures. However, updates on a non-coarray dummy argument associated with a coarray actual argument via coindexed accesses are prohibited; image control statements can be used to avoid such a situation." Isn't 12.5.2.8p1 already prohibits associating non-coarray dummy with coarray actual? Anton