From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Tue Mar 15 21:08:57 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id D48FB3587A3; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 21:08:57 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from out1-srv2.flexfilter.nl (out1-srv2.flexfilter.nl [62.84.241.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 802F535877D for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 21:08:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from [89.18.180.60] (helo=mail.antivirus.flexwebhosting.nl) by srv2a.flexfilter.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1afvGl-0003zO-54; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 21:08:48 +0100 Received: from srv2059.flexwebhosting.nl ([89.18.176.59]) by mail.antivirus.flexwebhosting.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.85_2) (envelope-from ) id 1afvGe-0005NF-SN; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 21:08:37 +0100 Received: from [145.129.230.224] (helo=PCForcheck) by srv2059.flexwebhosting.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1afvHN-00006K-Ut; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 21:09:22 +0100 From: "Forcheck" To: "'Cohen Malcolm'" , "'WG5'" References: <20160314163910.3E1A035730E@www.open-std.org> <20160315002027.D448E3582CC@www.open-std.org> In-Reply-To: <20160315002027.D448E3582CC@www.open-std.org> Subject: RE: (SC22WG5.5683) [ukfortran] F08/C201 Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 21:08:12 +0100 Message-ID: <006601d17ef6$67342420$359c6c60$@forcheck.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQIR5aKrjPa9s79ZzLCnWURK+Mv5bQLZBv7qnsNW7oA= Content-Language: nl X-Filter-ID: s0sct1PQhAABKnZB5plbIViX8Ok/cW3CCIXYGqQyNxdDBMjHO16K80oRNblReI11x5YB+7NnUQEm Uw8kSDgJq+V3quz5htJYRtr4z1TeBXCPRRXJko9GgtbPf7OBjHetCoupJqx6hgbOJpF7ztvRCHg9 i+nEmou2UMHgmE6z+uPpnAH3Z/yWJ/1UVv3cE79AcaWNR3QW6RTu9jyMe9uwQyfN7R/TVJS4B3Jn iW9RAyjXYu/IcQJuWHlbnMOsg605bzCO8YxVCtBgKDv3hcHIFj3dKxLhoxcmaInYbR5vlqFoA0sH 5RuXt9lQ+PoQIRFd+Q3eyB0s4KAhdRuioya4MKuhWMfSXMWlmpTJy4rXq7B7OWB916F7XvSTXtp6 F31R2cSVRC3s1npMU8OWeSRWje8o39FPRDsbQBPfEovnWpUDJT/zM5h0c5URGlLLtrLKz35eyw6y RiTLngsHI1rdoiQQa/kroxoEmAO5nGjIz+46it93D1RlHvuNCj77mmUy6hUtQJQDQV/O5gc6V+uc MHAXQhc+EbmlTgBmmSAiVnZAg/Ac+sOWqiKDM3YCDteOscXQ8a0ES4t+r9uBdatoTHtzJzDXtW19 p+oSJq/sPNShljCG+LCt94F9oWAKPD8Uq/+yGBvUjo8+sSUSYWRowa9Q1Ec/6iKi2Ol3ywzJCOP1 mK53YHCTgvzYPKEdcBb1 X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@srv3a.flexfilter.nl X-Filter-Fingerprint: IFrWXGses7OKB5S5G8/dJRn/7L7+nnclbWGk7OJ1jHJA3cTUQ1R++keuE7RDJ8Kg3RbMLUalw1oC mj99/u+PoqoVy8a3lsStJtAvpObFX0Wok1JBYnOLzfRIhlEHQynLUpndEJ0YoaLytXXo8BMTaX2p Mk7LBarWD9Fj4R3eIu5cOy/3Wm9qfF/CZNvP/2Kowv61T+KDYyYtREgszdyFwv8IxCB3p/oCKvxr eyISh3JGb7OS5oVgiO+kDxZrVPLz3MmEGC2PrUKqLq5WmHK+Nw== X-Originating-IP: 89.18.180.60 X-SpamExperts-Domain: fxwrelaydummydomein.nl X-SpamExperts-Username: 89.18.180.60 Authentication-Results: flexfilter.nl; auth=pass smtp.auth=89.18.180.60@fxwrelaydummydomein.nl X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Class: ham X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.05) X-Recommended-Action: accept Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk Excuses for the typo. I know it compiles ok without the typo. So C201 is incorrect? Will it be corrected? Do I have to ask for an interpretation? Cheers, Erik -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org [mailto:owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org] Namens Cohen Malcolm Verzonden: dinsdag 15 maart 2016 01:14 Aan: WG5 Onderwerp: (SC22WG5.5683) [ukfortran] F08/C201 >Is the following code standard conforming? No. >C201 disallows the End Subroutine statement. Is this correct? No. >Subroutine sub1 > Block > Interface > Subroutine sub > End Subrouttine Typo. > End Interface > End Block >End You should find that it compiles ok after correcting the typo. Cheers, -- ........................Malcolm Cohen, Nihon NAG, Tokyo.