From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Tue Mar 15 01:20:27 2016
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id ACA573585D8; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 01:20:27 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
X-Greylist: delayed 396 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at www5.open-std.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 01:20:26 CET
Received: from nag-j.co.jp (bvdeuz19.secure.ne.jp [180.222.80.19])
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 862A135730E
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 01:20:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: (qmail 36052 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2016 09:13:40 +0900
Received: from unknown (HELO Maru10) (218.42.159.105)
  by 0 with SMTP; 15 Mar 2016 09:13:40 +0900
Message-ID: <38C3DCAAF87B431BB5568BF7E6DAA194@Maru10>
From: "Cohen Malcolm" <malcolm@nag-j.co.jp>
To: "WG5" <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
References: <20160314163910.3E1A035730E@www.open-std.org>
In-Reply-To: <20160314163910.3E1A035730E@www.open-std.org>
Subject: Re: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.5682) F08/C201
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 09:14:16 +0900
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 16.4.3528.331
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V16.4.3528.331
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

>Is the following code standard conforming?

No.

>C201 disallows the End Subroutine statement. Is this correct?

No.

>Subroutine sub1
>  Block
>    Interface
>      Subroutine sub
>      End Subrouttine

Typo.

>    End Interface
>  End Block
>End

You should find that it compiles ok after correcting the typo.

Cheers,
-- 
........................Malcolm Cohen, Nihon NAG, Tokyo.