From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Tue Mar 15 01:20:27 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id ACA573585D8; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 01:20:27 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org X-Greylist: delayed 396 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at www5.open-std.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 01:20:26 CET Received: from nag-j.co.jp (bvdeuz19.secure.ne.jp [180.222.80.19]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 862A135730E for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 01:20:22 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 36052 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2016 09:13:40 +0900 Received: from unknown (HELO Maru10) (218.42.159.105) by 0 with SMTP; 15 Mar 2016 09:13:40 +0900 Message-ID: <38C3DCAAF87B431BB5568BF7E6DAA194@Maru10> From: "Cohen Malcolm" To: "WG5" References: <20160314163910.3E1A035730E@www.open-std.org> In-Reply-To: <20160314163910.3E1A035730E@www.open-std.org> Subject: Re: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.5682) F08/C201 Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 09:14:16 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 16.4.3528.331 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V16.4.3528.331 Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk >Is the following code standard conforming? No. >C201 disallows the End Subroutine statement. Is this correct? No. >Subroutine sub1 > Block > Interface > Subroutine sub > End Subrouttine Typo. > End Interface > End Block >End You should find that it compiles ok after correcting the typo. Cheers, -- ........................Malcolm Cohen, Nihon NAG, Tokyo.