From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Sun Feb 7 01:41:15 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id B2594358796; Sun, 7 Feb 2016 01:41:15 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from nag-j.co.jp (bvdeuz19.secure.ne.jp [180.222.80.19]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B93C35711F for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2016 01:41:08 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 19231 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2016 09:41:04 +0900 Received: from unknown (HELO FujiMaru10) (216.241.51.146) by 0 with SMTP; 7 Feb 2016 09:41:04 +0900 Message-ID: From: "Malcolm Cohen" To: "WG5" Subject: My vote on draft corrigendum 4 has just changed to "NO". Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 09:41:13 +0900 Organization: NAG MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002A_01D1618B.AF23EA50" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 16.4.3528.331 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V16.4.3528.331 Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_002A_01D1618B.AF23EA50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi folks, I=1B$B!G=1B(Bm sorry, but this draft corrigendum makes 9.12p5 say =1B$B!H=1B(BThe value of an \si{internal-file-variable} ... shall not = ... be affected by data transfer caused by that statement.=1B$B!I=1B(B And yet, this is the ENTIRE PURPOSE of a WRITE to an internal file, to = affect the value of the internal-file-variable by means of data = transfer! It is clear that we cannot cover everything in a single sentence, since = the requirements on input and output statements should be quite = different. More words are needed. My vote will change back to =1B$B!H=1B(BYes=1B$B!I=1B(B if all the edits = from interp F08/0110 are removed. This interp needs to go back to = square one. Cheers, --=20 ...............................Malcolm. ------=_NextPart_000_002A_01D1618B.AF23EA50 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-2022-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi folks,

I=1B$B!G=1B(Bm sorry, but this draft corrigendum makes 9.12p5 = say

=1B$B!H=1B(BThe value of an \si{internal-file-variable} ... = shall not ... be=20 affected by data transfer caused by that statement.=1B$B!I=1B(B

And yet, this is the ENTIRE PURPOSE of a WRITE to an internal file, = to=20 affect the value of the internal-file-variable by means of data = transfer!

It is clear that we cannot cover everything in a single sentence, = since the=20 requirements on input and output statements should be quite = different. =20 More words are needed.

My vote will change back to =1B$B!H=1B(BYes=1B$B!I=1B(B if all the = edits from interp F08/0110 are=20 removed. This interp needs to go back to square one.

Cheers,

...............................Malcolm.

------=_NextPart_000_002A_01D1618B.AF23EA50--