From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Fri Feb 5 03:17:18 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 58B59358793; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 03:17:18 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from nag-j.co.jp (bvdeuz19.secure.ne.jp [180.222.80.19]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 32AFA3570B3 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 03:17:10 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 65361 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2016 11:17:03 +0900 Received: from unknown (HELO Maru10) (218.42.159.105) by 0 with SMTP; 5 Feb 2016 11:17:03 +0900 Message-ID: From: "Cohen Malcolm" To: "WG5" References: <20160204111147.3560A358762@www.open-std.org> In-Reply-To: <20160204111147.3560A358762@www.open-std.org> Subject: Re: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.5671) Draft result of straw ballot on secondCorr. 4 Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 11:18:06 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 16.4.3528.331 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V16.4.3528.331 Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk Hi folks, Sorry, (a) got distracted by the day job, (b) thought the deadline was the end of the week instead of Thursday! Here are some more comments. Again, this is an interim response - I may well have other comments later (hopefully today...). (7) In the edit for F08/0130 at [128:15-17], in the first change use "other than" not "apart from". This is because that is the wording we use elsewhere (and although the difference is subtle, "apart from" does not have quite the right connotations for this context). I note that this same interp has the correct wording in its edit for [131:16-19](!) so we need to be consistent. (8) Same edit, in the editing instructions, delete the comma after "STAT_STOPPED_IMAGE occurs", since that would produce consecutive commas in the standard (the "so that the entire paragraph reads" bit is right). (9) In the edit for F08/0130 at [131:16-19], the reference should be [131:17-19] since line 16 is unchanged. (10) Same edit, in the editing instructions, delete the comma after "STAT_STOPPED_IMAGE occurs". (11) In the edit for F08/0104 at [150:28+], the editing instructions should say "item (10)" not "bullet item (10)" since it is not a bullet item, and should say "insert a new item" not "insert a new bullet", for the same reason. (12) Same edit, item "(nn)" should be "(10a)" in accordance with our usual conventions, so as to be consistent with many other interps. (13) In the edit for F08/0126 at [151:7-8], "coarray bound" should be "cobound", twice (we do not have to say "coarray cobound" as that is unnecessarily redundant) actually it would be even clearer to without repeating an indefinite article in the first place, i.e. the edit should be "a type parameter or an array bound" ->"a type parameter, array bound, or cobound" "the type parameter or array bound" ->"the type parameter, array bound, or cobound". (14) Actually, that paragraph also needs the edit "\si{specification-part}" -> "scoping unit", thrice, but that's probably beyond the bounds of what we can safely change at this point. -- ........................Malcolm Cohen, Nihon NAG, Tokyo.