From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Thu Feb 4 20:25:43 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 02E923587B1; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 20:25:42 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org X-Greylist: delayed 663 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at www5.open-std.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 20:25:42 CET Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DF59358762 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 20:25:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Feb 2016 11:14:34 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,396,1449561600"; d="scan'208";a="896528489" Received: from orsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.225.131]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Feb 2016 11:14:34 -0800 Received: from orsmsx161.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.240.84) by ORSMSX104.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.225.131) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 11:14:34 -0800 Received: from orsmsx103.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.72]) by ORSMSX161.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.233]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 11:14:34 -0800 From: "Whitlock, Stan" To: WG5 Subject: RE: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5669) RE: Straw ballot on second draft corrigendum 4 Thread-Topic: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5669) RE: Straw ballot on second draft corrigendum 4 Thread-Index: AQHRXxzlO06+W6ikHEiW7jyrzQpj758cQhtw Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 19:14:33 +0000 Message-ID: <4AA982B1265F43408480F737BE12F4D36FC0769C@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <20160204060540.08ECC3586E5@www.open-std.org> <56B2FBA3.7060807@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <56B2FBA3.7060807@oracle.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiODFhYzJjMGEtN2U2Mi00YWQ1LTk5ZDQtNDA5OWYxYjMwODU3IiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX0lDIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE1LjQuMTAuMTkiLCJUcnVzdGVkTGFiZWxIYXNoIjoiYlZxTE5oWnF0MzFEMHlzaDYxTllQTVZObFQxckVpTExOVnd1SzFUOVNPST0ifQ== x-ctpclassification: CTP_IC x-originating-ip: [10.22.254.140] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk Thanks, Bob, for pointing out that change in N2094 - I missed it. /Stan -----Original Message----- From: j3-bounces@mailman.j3-fortran.org [mailto:j3-bounces@mailman.j3-fortr= an.org] On Behalf Of Robert Corbett Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 2:20 AM To: j3@mailman.j3-fortran.org Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5669) RE: Straw ballot on second draft corr= igendum 4 On 02/03/16 22:05, Whitlock, Stan wrote: > * [243:6-7] Note 9.64a says "data object" when the interp edit says "= variable". > I could not find an interp ballot that made this change although i= t seems > reasonable. Which term should be used in this note? > This change was made in response to my complaint about the wording in the f= irst ballot. In particular, the same restriction is needed for named constants as is nee= ded for variables. The term "data object" covers both cases. Bob Corbett _______________________________________________ J3 mailing list J3@mailman.j3-fortran.org http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3