From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Thu Feb 4 07:06:27 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 303143587B1; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 07:06:27 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org X-Greylist: delayed 954 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at www5.open-std.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 07:06:26 CET Received: from userp1050.oracle.com (userp1050.oracle.com [156.151.31.82]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8A403586F6 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 07:06:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from userp1040.oracle.com (userp1040.oracle.com [156.151.31.81]) by userp1050.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id u145oWir018000 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 05:50:33 GMT Received: from userv0021.oracle.com (userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id u145oOow024934 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 05:50:24 GMT Received: from userv0121.oracle.com (userv0121.oracle.com [156.151.31.72]) by userv0021.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u145oOSB019800 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 05:50:24 GMT Received: from abhmp0015.oracle.com (abhmp0015.oracle.com [141.146.116.21]) by userv0121.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u145oNaC013371 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 05:50:24 GMT Received: from [10.132.140.77] (/10.132.140.77) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 21:50:23 -0800 Message-ID: <56B2E60A.7020106@oracle.com> Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 21:47:54 -0800 From: Robert Corbett Reply-To: robert.corbett@oracle.com Organization: Oracle America User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; SunOS sun4u; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110814 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: WG5 Subject: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5667) Straw ballot on second draft corrigendum 4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Source-IP: userp1040.oracle.com [156.151.31.81] Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk Please answer the following question "Is N2095, with the references and notes removed, acceptable for submission to SC22 for publication as Corrigendum 4 for Fortran 2008?" in one of these ways. 1) Yes. 2) Yes, but I recommend the following changes. 3) No, for the following reasons. 4) Abstain. I vote yes. I think Subclause 9.12 needs further revision, but the proposed edits do not make the subclause worse. Robert Corbett representing Oracle America