From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Thu Feb 4 07:05:39 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id B2105358743; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 07:05:39 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9DE63570B3 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 07:05:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Feb 2016 22:05:31 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,393,1449561600"; d="scan'208";a="905237814" Received: from orsmsx103.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.225.130]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Feb 2016 22:05:31 -0800 Received: from orsmsx159.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.240.24) by ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.225.130) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 22:05:31 -0800 Received: from orsmsx103.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.72]) by ORSMSX159.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.11.77]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 22:05:30 -0800 From: "Whitlock, Stan" To: WG5 Subject: RE: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5668) Straw ballot on second draft corrigendum 4 Thread-Topic: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5668) Straw ballot on second draft corrigendum 4 Thread-Index: AdFfEMzjvmWPzzJyRlSbzF7U0Xd+/Q== Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 06:05:30 +0000 Message-ID: <4AA982B1265F43408480F737BE12F4D36FC072C8@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiZmM3MWJmNDYtZWU5NS00MTIxLTkxZDAtNzUzMDgyMTA1ZmNiIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX0lDIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE1LjQuMTAuMTkiLCJUcnVzdGVkTGFiZWxIYXNoIjoiTGFSdGF6VStLOVwvRzBCcXg0VDQrOWpvMUZaNjlNbDZuWUtvMG5BN1dJRHc9In0= x-ctpclassification: CTP_IC x-originating-ip: [10.22.254.140] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk Hi, John - I have verified that all of the edits for all of the interps tha= t make up F2008 Corrigendum 4 are in N2095. Congratulations to David and you for another outstanding job. N2096 asks: Please answer the following question "Is N2095, with the references and notes removed, acceptable for submission to SC22 for publication as Corrigendum 4 for Fortran 2008?" in one of these ways.=20 1) Yes. 2) Yes, but I recommend the following changes.=20 3) No, for the following reasons. 4) Abstain. I vote "Yes, but I recommend the following changes": * [6:7+] should "parent component" be bold? * [150:28+] and [152:7-8] add transformational functions from certain intrinsic modules to constant and specification expressions, respecti= vely. Should this be mentioned in the Introduction [xv] as new to F2008? * [152:7-8] should "IEEE_ARITHMETIC" be followed by an xref "(14)" like in [150:28+]? * [194:6-] and [195:2-] inconsistently precede {or not} terms , , and with "the". Should these edit= s at least be consistent? * [243:6-7] Note 9.64a says "data object" when the interp edit says "var= iable". I could not find an interp ballot that made this change although it s= eems reasonable. Which term should be used in this note? Thanks /Stan Whitlock Intel Corporation