From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Thu Feb  4 00:29:04 2016
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 5667B3586E5; Thu,  4 Feb 2016 00:29:04 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from st11p02im-asmtp001.me.com (st11p02im-asmtp001.me.com [17.172.220.113])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02A07357140
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Thu,  4 Feb 2016 00:28:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.0.11] (97-118-18-35.hlrn.qwest.net [97.118.18.35])
 by st11p02im-asmtp001.me.com
 (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.36.0 64bit (built Sep  8 2015))
 with ESMTPSA id <0O1Z00RBWVW6AP30@st11p02im-asmtp001.me.com> for
 sc22wg5@open-std.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 23:28:55 +0000 (GMT)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,,
 definitions=2016-02-03_11:,, signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0
 clxscore=1015 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0
 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1
 engine=8.0.1-1510270003 definitions=main-1602030406
From: Dan Nagle <danlnagle@me.com>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Fwd: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5667) Straw ballot on second draft corrigendum
 4
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 16:28:53 -0700
References: <20160203225536.CEED8357140@www.open-std.org>
To: WG5 List <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
Message-id: <E9B1F06C-1670-40B5-8983-8111F08BCBA4@me.com>
MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi,


Please answer the following question "Is N2095, with the references and=20=

notes removed, acceptable for submission to SC22 for publication as
Corrigendum 4 for Fortran 2008?" in one of these ways.=20

1) Yes.
2) Yes, but I recommend the following changes.=20
3) No, for the following reasons.
4) Abstain.

I vote =93Yes=94.

--

Cheers!
Dan Nagle




