From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Mon Feb  1 14:51:03 2016
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 9859C35723B; Mon,  1 Feb 2016 14:51:03 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
X-Greylist: delayed 403 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at www5.open-std.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 14:51:03 CET
Received: from postout2.mail.lrz.de (postout2.mail.lrz.de [129.187.255.138])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D8F1357222
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Mon,  1 Feb 2016 14:50:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: from lxmhs52.srv.lrz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by postout2.mail.lrz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3pv9VR3x8gzyTL
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Mon,  1 Feb 2016 14:44:15 +0100 (CET)
Authentication-Results: postout.lrz.de (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
	reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)" header.d=lrz.de
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=lrz.de; h=
	mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type
	:content-language:accept-language:message-id:date:date:subject
	:subject:from:from:received:received:received:received; s=
	postout; t=1454334255; bh=cQ63GxKo7xMY+To50EVnLKBuUQOOTTUoKGqv2l
	NqWaE=; b=lttWbcP1QjweosFSFJXAYCBLqsL8891UGtzRpLU9cV466fTmergwPi
	L9ivoDB9iJVATix0nY8qN5IvyBwk0gZfIy5AAwrvGrDgXSbnsB9cBceUNF6/NwPN
	PuY5tC+PjdMCs/1LRqpar0YLzdfVDjiH6qr3scayuNtnFwdZ7ycIWXZ0NAWBnEVr
	MFHHBcJIW/23uYcT2c/ft0CF8xjLQducBPucNpHMIWUe7x0giHKVq/8Cdas75/Qc
	dOpXCFzsz2Y/8QUeqw06QfzARD6mjyOaPCc+ud+kpnp35Ymns6cYhuDibFYviQXb
	haP5Gj7ily0ZzovSEqYvdQTU9SSLNrzQ==
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at lrz.de in lxmhs52.srv.lrz.de
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.885
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.885 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, LRZ_DATE_TZ_0000=0.001,
	LRZ_DKIM_DESTROY_MTA=0.001, LRZ_DMARC_LRZ_FAIL=0.001,
	LRZ_DMARC_OVERWRITE=0.001, LRZ_ENVFROM_LRZ_S=0.001,
	LRZ_FROM_AP_PHRASE=0.001, LRZ_FROM_LRZ_S=0.001, LRZ_FROM_PHRASE=0.001,
	LRZ_FROM_PRE_SUR_ADDR=0.001, LRZ_FWD_MS_EX=0.001,
	LRZ_HAS_X_ORIG_IP=0.001, LRZ_MSGID_HL32=0.001,
	LRZ_MSGID_SPAM_68=0.001, LRZ_RCVD_MS_EX=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001]
	autolearn=no
Received: from postout2.mail.lrz.de ([127.0.0.1])
	by lxmhs52.srv.lrz.de (lxmhs52.srv.lrz.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 20024)
	with LMTP id eMF0WsUYek6s for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>;
	Mon,  1 Feb 2016 14:44:15 +0100 (CET)
Received: from BADWLRZ-SWMBX04.ads.mwn.de (BADWLRZ-SWMBX04.ads.mwn.de [IPv6:2001:4ca0:0:108::160])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "BADWLRZ-SWMBX04", Issuer "BADWLRZ-SWMBX04" (not verified))
	by postout2.mail.lrz.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3pv9V91MYJzyb2
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Mon,  1 Feb 2016 14:44:01 +0100 (CET)
Received: from BADWLRZ-SWMBX01.ads.mwn.de (2001:4ca0:0:108::157) by
 BADWLRZ-SWMBX04.ads.mwn.de (2001:4ca0:0:108::160) with Microsoft SMTP Server
 (TLS) id 15.0.1156.6; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 14:44:00 +0100
Received: from BADWLRZ-SWMBX01.ads.mwn.de ([fe80::9d46:d25e:8d12:6786]) by
 BADWLRZ-SWMBX01.ads.mwn.de ([fe80::9d46:d25e:8d12:6786%12]) with mapi id
 15.00.1156.000; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 14:44:00 +0100
From: "Bader, Reinhold" <Reinhold.Bader@lrz.de>
To: WG5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
Subject: Straw ballot on second draft corrigendum 4
Thread-Topic: Straw ballot on second draft corrigendum 4
Thread-Index: AdFc9n6WtYibCvgmTT2ALUmZMyV5gA==
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 13:44:00 +0000
Message-ID: <1c7aa64e56ce4d59a4535939e12659a0@BADWLRZ-SWMBX01.ads.mwn.de>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [2001:4ca0:0:f031::5]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

Please answer the following question "Is N2095, with the references and=20
notes removed, acceptable for submission to SC22 for publication as
Corrigendum 4 for Fortran 2008?" in one of these ways.=20

1) Yes.

Regards
Reinhold


