From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Thu Jan 28 14:04:50 2016
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id E9209358762; Thu, 28 Jan 2016 14:04:49 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
X-Greylist: delayed 1566 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at www5.open-std.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2016 14:04:48 CET
Received: from out1-srv2.flexfilter.nl (out1-srv2.flexfilter.nl [62.84.241.67])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C19DC3572EC
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Thu, 28 Jan 2016 14:04:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [89.18.180.60] (helo=mail.antivirus.flexwebhosting.nl)
	by srv2a.flexfilter.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.85)
	(envelope-from <forcheck@forcheck.nl>)
	id 1aOlqG-0000AL-Av
	for sc22wg5@open-std.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2016 13:38:33 +0100
Received: from srv2059.flexwebhosting.nl ([89.18.176.59])
	by mail.antivirus.flexwebhosting.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.85)
	(envelope-from <forcheck@forcheck.nl>)
	id 1aOlqu-0002MS-0h
	for sc22wg5@open-std.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2016 13:39:08 +0100
Received: from 77-173-137-2.ip.telfort.nl ([77.173.137.2] helo=PCForcheck)
	by srv2059.flexwebhosting.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <forcheck@forcheck.nl>)
	id 1aOlqD-0001pg-VG
	for sc22wg5@open-std.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2016 13:38:26 +0100
From: <erik@forcheck.nl>
To: "'WG5'" <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
References: <20160121143417.3C8EF358651@www.open-std.org> <20160128084819.5A04435852E@www.open-std.org>
In-Reply-To: <20160128084819.5A04435852E@www.open-std.org>
Subject: (SC22WG5.5656) [ukfortran] Straw ballot on second draft corrigendum4
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 13:38:19 +0100
Message-ID: <008b01d159c8$c49deb30$4dd9c190$@forcheck.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQGSNBxiXOD6zQX5YIXjup6XuWAvPQFeVhnhn4QyShA=
Content-Language: nl
X-Filter-ID: s0sct1PQhAABKnZB5plbIViX8Ok/cW3CCIXYGqQyNxdDBMjHO16K80oRNblReI11x5YB+7NnUQEm
 Uw8kSDgJqxRv8dcjjQ+ZEDAwWyPl9MObWNIntKKEugcE06HUTZW6lNsjl/D0CRowqxU8xqCxBuqk
 T1mVyy1Qpvyd2nXGhj5nRxNL9a/BMu21HpraWvABHHASJNUmoOHSoqgqxfHmWS2+fo1dT+Xhz1sx
 jc1rnycYgBGJt+LxqX0DcUiI5Pns2Qu4rZTUwq6dxvK/FpC2T2kxtHaIUEwrwo+nz0PExiM9Bxb9
 CqFkX7mtP3wGJ3GfgY9ou2TWClNTn7aHEY9l2tjaf9AIE713TBiI2WzBMBM7aQU1ocfgUL/c6zQC
 KQ2vrOjsBxSo3OuQ7WRDUhbxp0PglvlGA31jXJulvcg9llNTHG/VCUZOF92Cu3qb+2NJRj23Plos
 wc8EFaMVw+Tbg3lLI/1aXOIvvk+hErlYwzxjCL3iXuvH9t9BKOmy6Vy3X/rrifzFlnX3dmFkeNBd
 G6INMS1CpjQso2qh0j9PXsNDVA6DDYBlx3gObTbcRYHe6J1fhOzjF0b4LXcjJZ5lonh53qyalACq
 /IXyZ96b0jk55VN2Q1xv1lNtHRulT2bwsDTqf92j+HgdYHRyZH3fqDLy1M/6RWUxnTHJalM4TkY=
X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@srv3a.flexfilter.nl
X-Filter-Fingerprint: IFrWXGses7OKB5S5G8/dJRn/7L7+nnclbWGk7OJ1jHJA3cTUQ1R++keuE7RDJ8Kg3RbMLUalw1oC
 mj99/u+PoqoVy8a3lsStJtAvpObFX0Wok1JBYnOLzfRIhlEHQynLUpndEJ0YoaLytXXo8BMTaX2p
 Mk7LBarWD9Fj4R3eIu5cOy/3Wm9qfF/CZNvP/2Kowv61T+KDYyYtREgszdyFwv8IxCB3p/oCKvxr
 eyISh3JGb7OS5oVgiO+kDxZrVPLz3MmEGC2PrUKqLq5WmHK+Nw==
X-Originating-IP: 89.18.180.60
X-SpamExperts-Domain: fxwrelaydummydomein.nl
X-SpamExperts-Username: 89.18.180.60
Authentication-Results: flexfilter.nl; auth=pass smtp.auth=89.18.180.60@fxwrelaydummydomein.nl
X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Class: ham
X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.07)
X-Recommended-Action: accept
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

>Please answer the following question "Is N2095, with the references and =

>notes removed, acceptable for submission to SC22 for publication as=20
>Corrigendum 4 for Fortran 2008?" in one of these ways.
>
>1) Yes.
>2) Yes, but I recommend the following changes.

Yes, but I recommend the following changes.

>3) No, for the following reasons.
>4) Abstain.

CHANGES:
Subclause 11.2.3
In constraint C1113, after "shall be the name of a nonintrinsic module" =
insert "that declares a separate module procedure".
Change to:
In constraint C1113, after "shall be the name of a nonintrinsic module" =
insert "that declares a separate module procedure of which the separate =
module procedure is not present".

Reason: If the implementation of the separate module procedure is in the =
module there is also no need for a submodule.

Erik Kruyt
Forcheck b.v.


