From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Fri Jan 22 20:26:48 2016
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id BB806358743; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 20:26:48 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (mailhost.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.139.106])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACAFD3572C9
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 20:26:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [137.79.7.57] (math.jpl.nasa.gov [137.79.7.57])
	by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id u0MJQeG1017370
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128 bits) verified NO)
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 11:26:43 -0800
Subject: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5648) Straw ballot on second draft corrigendum 4
From: Van Snyder <Van.Snyder@jpl.nasa.gov>
Reply-To: Van.Snyder@jpl.nasa.gov
To: WG5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Organization: Yes
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 11:26:40 -0800
Message-ID: <1453490800.11277.800.camel@math.jpl.nasa.gov>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 (2.32.3-34.el6) 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Source-Sender: Van.Snyder@jpl.nasa.gov
X-AUTH: Authorized
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

 > Please answer the following question "Is N2095, with the references and
 > notes removed, acceptable for submission to SC22 for publication as
 > Corrigendum 4 for Fortran 2008?" in one of these ways.
 >
 > 1) Yes.
 > 2) Yes, but I recommend the following changes.
 > 3) No, for the following reasons.
 > 4) Abstain.

I vote 'yes'.

Van.