From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Fri Jan 22 18:05:13 2016
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id E77AF358609; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 18:05:12 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from smtp-out-11.tiscali.co.uk (smtp-out-11.tiscali.co.uk [62.24.139.98])
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8CCA3566B2
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 18:05:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([78.150.18.188])
	by smtp.talktalk.net with SMTP
	id Mf92a75F67DWMMf92aXyEB; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 17:05:08 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [78.150.18.188]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.5639) Straw ballot on second draft corrigendum 4
From: David Muxworthy <d.muxworthy@bcs.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20160121143417.3C8EF358651@www.open-std.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 17:05:04 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <17E39052-D941-4BB4-99C7-23CC07132F64@bcs.org.uk>
References: <20160121143417.3C8EF358651@www.open-std.org>
To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfD8jClJ+ye3lQIHUXWrGO7V3pgq6OSmzYUn72xLQmuBfeeME9nL1hVCLe+5jpvka2/Huo81205a0wGx2Xzuljv2ksH2YdE2C9ruVN8lunSRNUWXTFK+d
 bCfR5WGhIDE9Fs9oBAz7TKBlvBhawutHe04bpAWZ9pfY4OeZiiBJwhkQuhIuI4HcTSbWv6rPlfYxWw==
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

> Please answer the following question "Is N2095, with the references and 
> notes removed, acceptable for submission to SC22 for publication as
> Corrigendum 4 for Fortran 2008?" in one of these ways. 
> 
> 1) Yes.
> 2) Yes, but I recommend the following changes. 
> 3) No, for the following reasons.
> 4) Abstain.

I vote 'yes'.

David Muxworthy