From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Fri Jan 22 05:45:14 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id C177E35725F; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 05:45:14 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from nag-j.co.jp (bvdeuz19.secure.ne.jp [180.222.80.19]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E2FE3566B2 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 05:45:07 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 76318 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2016 13:45:04 +0900 Received: from unknown (HELO Maru10) (218.42.159.105) by 0 with SMTP; 22 Jan 2016 13:45:04 +0900 Message-ID: <6A783638FA3D474A9BD250601D9C2819@Maru10> From: "Cohen Malcolm" To: "sc22wg5" References: <20160121213038.CAD8E358651@www.open-std.org> In-Reply-To: <20160121213038.CAD8E358651@www.open-std.org> Subject: Re: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.5642) Another comment on Corrigendum 4 Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 13:45:51 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 16.4.3528.331 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V16.4.3528.331 Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk Thinking further about Van's example, it would seem that in > C1278a An INTENT(OUT) dummy argument of a pure procedure shall not be > polymorphic or have a polymorphic allocatable ultimate component. what we need instead of "ultimate component" is our new term "potential subobject component". Cheers, -- ........................Malcolm Cohen, Nihon NAG, Tokyo.