From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Thu Dec 24 10:33:31 2015
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 6464435863C; Thu, 24 Dec 2015 10:33:31 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from smtp-out-12.tiscali.co.uk (unknown [62.24.139.99])
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12A3635692D
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Thu, 24 Dec 2015 10:33:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.1.8] ([80.47.119.202])
	by smtp.talktalk.net with SMTP
	id C2H3a34OnmxAhC2H3acStq; Thu, 24 Dec 2015 09:33:29 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [80.47.119.202]
Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5624) Interpretations straw ballot 11
To: WG5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
References: <20151223214541.B4BF1358626@www.open-std.org>
From: John Reid <John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <567BBBEF.6060902@stfc.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 09:33:35 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/42.0 SeaMonkey/2.39
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20151223214541.B4BF1358626@www.open-std.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfIARq8Dwc7AxwnqVE5u8fCG8jXFZOwClfY1QmDuRRLdalNpkuAKvoclC6/++FQVqkJLKWvKGxyKuUrvZyQNW4K/nWsgpEhMLmmM8sUHmAOnb+g0I0de9
 EdjGDMs4oByNXNcjYIueFiV3g0V9znA+1PMyz/yf7oqDgcLW05oJ6ZQ0AXb9+uWMcshSrtMaIHZ/G71uorv8f9/SPk5KzDzR3+8=
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk



Bill Long wrote:

>
> Comment for F08/0141:
> ---------------------
>
> The first Edit should be at [24:11+] (and not at [22:11+]).
>
> {And hence in the stated subclause. I assume previous changes have
> removed or modified the last sentence of the previous paragraph in
> 10-007r1 "Any standard-conforming Fortran 2003 ... 1539".}
>

Yes, Corr. 1 added to the front of this sentence "Except as identified 
in this subclause,".

John.
