From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Wed Dec 23 09:19:55 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id E07ED358633; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 09:19:55 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from userp1040.oracle.com (userp1040.oracle.com [156.151.31.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BED43356821 for ; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 09:19:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from aserv0022.oracle.com (aserv0022.oracle.com [141.146.126.234]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id tBN8JgtY006092 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 08:19:43 GMT Received: from userv0121.oracle.com (userv0121.oracle.com [156.151.31.72]) by aserv0022.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id tBN8Jgg3029954 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 08:19:42 GMT Received: from abhmp0009.oracle.com (abhmp0009.oracle.com [141.146.116.15]) by userv0121.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id tBN8JfPI032247 for ; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 08:19:42 GMT Received: from [10.132.140.77] (/10.132.140.77) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 00:19:41 -0800 Message-ID: <567A58B8.9030706@oracle.com> Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 00:18:00 -0800 From: Robert Corbett Reply-To: robert.corbett@oracle.com Organization: Oracle America User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; SunOS sun4u; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110814 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: WG5 Subject: Corrigendum 4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Source-IP: aserv0022.oracle.com [141.146.126.234] Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk I vote 1) Yes. Nonetheless, the edits for Subclause 9.12 need further work. The new Note 9.64a refers to "this process" without an obvious antecedent. I assume it means the process prescribed by "The semantics of how a variable is denoted". The sentence Anything that affects this process is prohibited in this context; that includes the values of any subscripts used, and if the variable is specified by a pointer function reference, anything that affects the evaluation of that function. is troubling. If "anything" that affects the process of determining how a variable is denoted is prohibited, it is impossible to denote a variable. The values of any subscripts used affect the process of determining how a variable is denoted, and indeed the sentence goes on to says that the values of any subscripts used are prohibited. The proposed edits apply only to variables. References to subobjects of named constants also need protection. Robert Corbett