From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Mon Dec 21 23:19:40 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id ABF673587E4; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 23:19:40 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from out1.srv1.flexfilter.nl (out1.srv1.flexfilter.nl [62.84.244.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DCD535690C for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 23:19:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from [89.18.180.60] (helo=mail.antivirus.flexwebhosting.nl) by srv1a.flexfilter.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1aB8ni-0006fn-AA for sc22wg5@open-std.org; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 23:19:34 +0100 Received: from srv2059.flexwebhosting.nl ([89.18.176.59]) by mail.antivirus.flexwebhosting.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1aB8ny-0007JM-GO for sc22wg5@open-std.org; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 23:19:46 +0100 Received: from 77-173-137-2.ip.telfort.nl ([77.173.137.2] helo=PCForcheck) by srv2059.flexwebhosting.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1aB8nQ-0003dt-Jv for sc22wg5@open-std.org; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 23:19:13 +0100 From: "Erik Kruyt" To: Subject: RE: (SC22WG5.5617) Interpretations Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 23:19:00 +0100 Message-ID: <000001d13c3d$978a4d30$c69ee790$@forcheck.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01D13C45.F94F2A60" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AdE8OvQ3U+YXcrC+SnioCgzCliBB6g== Content-Language: nl X-Filter-ID: s0sct1PQhAABKnZB5plbIb1LeybhW2qX5eEgOt6WpkxlIEerTejTSObJOJOrho6UWQ0UJOjFsat2 lTd/bNK6J5PejjoESUGONmGhgGwzhg1C/lGsrXcsS0xY0J18f6o7xB66CWvXcfKDfXjTU++u65r2 BGSysLap0ok62BmnrUrvttsSbuwOqfvXXcElYI7XZuM7jUXIESohoO51xWmU8c8KdjvtIIgWUj0g 1U5peLrMz4KV0ChqxZklV/XrmXG01cPlhg84p/Bid4fRoVt1SypgzVLraik+Pm0noDl3IsTrjuU3 A3io6xJmD59iFVkbUztA2t48qMeUBTYHWX5eFAj5E5cjHTqCBSZq5bgXN9Km6W9Yy+DJzPiW518I 6XCFG5b/+/xmAxi+qQQD8d0YcRw8KfWVgBtIzWSRMiXKnCK3SGMF43kffO93vLz9y7qcu8AlcXVf E3O+O6Haz3XE/pxwj7G309dkj99epKWv2wINBF4OKfp6sDCu2bDdRfgiKTZG2GCfGGe3ec4u+I+h f7NbArIiZ2IWkjlb+jHKqXhLFsQAgqQHXcmkSF1/3iGttR7bqX9aSgCwLVpXkhwvmkOG9gfiKUbQ EABSDbNNX7ocBheoTE5VPHEMcF5EKts1Xmzrhz3fY1kiWRGDIjGJZTEvuGslKTrRIXcXpFg5ivY= X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@srv3a.flexfilter.nl X-Filter-Fingerprint: IFrWXGses7OKB5S5G8/dJRn/7L7+nnclbWGk7OJ1jHJA3cTUQ1R++keuE7RDJ8Kg3RbMLUalw1oC mj99/u+PoqoVy8a3lsStJtAvpObFX0Wok1JBYnOLzfRIhlEHQynLUpndEJ0YoaLytXXo8BMTaX2p Mk7LBarWD9Fj4R3eIu5cOy/3Wm9qfF/CZNvP/2Kowv61T+KDYyYtREgszdyFwv8IxCB3p/oCKvxr eyISh3JGb7OS5oVgiO+kDxZrVPLz3MmEGC2PrUKqLq5WmHK+Nw== X-Originating-IP: 89.18.180.60 X-SpamExperts-Domain: fxwrelaydummydomein.nl X-SpamExperts-Username: 89.18.180.60 Authentication-Results: flexfilter.nl; auth=pass smtp.auth=89.18.180.60@fxwrelaydummydomein.nl X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Class: ham X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.13) X-Recommended-Action: accept Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01D13C45.F94F2A60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Though I did vote already Yes on F08/0142 I have the following question/remark. Only if a module declares a separate module procedure of which the separate module procedure is not in that module the module has to export the private details of the module. So in my opinion the addition to C1113 should read: "that declares a separate module procedure of which no implementation is present in that module" Am I right? Erik Kruyt Forcheck b.v. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01D13C45.F94F2A60 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Though I = did vote already Yes on F08/0142 I have the following = question/remark.

 

Only if a = module declares a separate module procedure of which the separate module = procedure is not in that module the module has to export the private = details of the module.

 

So in my = opinion the addition to C1113 should read:

"that = declares a separate module procedure of which no implementation is = present in that module"

 

Am I = right?

 

Erik = Kruyt

Forcheck = b.v.

 

------=_NextPart_000_0001_01D13C45.F94F2A60--