From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Mon Dec 21 19:08:27 2015
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 38AA535877D; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 19:08:27 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from smtp-out-12.tiscali.co.uk (unknown [62.24.139.99])
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB3F35690C
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 19:08:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([92.19.70.130])
	by smtp.talktalk.net with SMTP
	id B4sgaPwtGmxAhB4shaYnRO; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 18:08:23 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [92.19.70.130]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.5613) Interpretations straw ballot 11
From: David Muxworthy <d.muxworthy@bcs.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20151219140637.231C03586E5@www.open-std.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 18:08:22 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FB8FE1F7-B319-465F-9C3E-6023B5D81A26@bcs.org.uk>
References: <20151219140637.231C03586E5@www.open-std.org>
To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfIXNnLKpD0UfSZXu8DZ+MIXCB9Ff2Q0m4pa8JT1+g86EN81dmrN17o3qo/6lGcYBubIQUvAYzXH9wWP50UsHlre3SrC8IL0xFaUSDfG5fX3U423qEtvJ
 dl4RgSGxto9wEKQTmXe60TXR6zrZ65Q4Tn/WETp4e3VMI6+Frenecu0d
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

My vote is:

-Y-  --- F08/0128 Is recursive USE within a submodule permitted?
-C-  --- F08/0138 Type extension in submodules
-Y-  --- F08/0139 Is the name of an external procedure that has a
                  binding label a local identifier?
-Y-  --- F08/0140 Assign to deferred-length coindexed character variable
-C-  --- F08/0141 Can a statement function have a variable-length PDT
                  result?
-Y-  --- F08/0142 Is useless module extension permitted?
-C-  --- F08/0143 May a pure procedure have an INTENT(OUT) polymorphic
                  component?
-C-  --- F08/0144 Is nonadvancing I/O allowed during execution of DO
                  CONCURRENT?

Comment on F08/0138:
In the question, 'C456' should read 'C465'.

Comment on F08/0141:
The first edit should be at [24:11+].

Comment on F08/0143:
I agree with John's comment.  The interp should include the location of =
the edit in 10-007r1.

Comment on F08/0144:
I agree with Erik's comment.


David Muxworthy