From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Sat Dec 19 10:02:02 2015
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 8AF8D358886; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 10:02:02 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from mail-pf0-f172.google.com (mail-pf0-f172.google.com [209.85.192.172])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A8E3568FB
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 10:02:01 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-pf0-f172.google.com with SMTP id v86so61301834pfa.2
        for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 01:02:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=edogawa-u-ac-jp.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
        h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent
         :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=X4Q6m6IIveqtBgh2gw7Q2XJZJGETZINEPNBNGNf4JQU=;
        b=mTCur80cCeiu9drQTPkHBs7DrD/yugXqV35/1OAey+zzafqTZxMmHXJwkz9WAtAjbP
         5Ye7EP6fI8d4AX7PsKgPkjN1+rkfPtkiuqE+ZUGhkaCqKKSq8qYOeh3R7h30N/0+Et+D
         LPyd4OIQyTrLen/Y8PVUQJy/QKWiFnIEmbd1e9IHte1fpeupf1sLdjx+NqBRjLx9abRL
         3/gbYnN5Ns80K//hZh4OLO26vFwBZvFpag0bJ0W/8YfwlwoCnVxLrmwmycRc/hrttZrz
         Xn6+4Sl+p0rSetAQJ2Y+B0zjMZ6RtzvlPXLxm72P+DOtJZOe6cLbqtsoqofo1k+8YKV6
         9EqA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization
         :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=X4Q6m6IIveqtBgh2gw7Q2XJZJGETZINEPNBNGNf4JQU=;
        b=GqxFq4RcEq22VT6PTgArXgpf+ObTAixqry/e04oIOd9vWxd9iVVtysN4eOAfMOuSps
         QAy95UEqxdhdwHt4ghXwq/IuFT+u9RU3SMvi/sR+3ChnxkbT8k3grvHlr/0oygzHbNBN
         QyI1jCVbIyqFNHSs7opS8cIb1M8HJl9Cajk8iiKD6fBsUg/3yxbt9fIBGnastuaKDtOB
         lzxIv7XSGa/hQUbee+Q79HWLexpzyXW0kGf/0w54oojtKIxxUgy+6OF5m4okS6o0n8AE
         5qIsXPw3IOhjHJLa3tWZyPDwTrrMMUuulkemdOSkkSMzbeOxPYUpZxHg6siEajETKJBI
         +jFw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk6ISGQzqV1g5US//Uw+pgB8WOmh64XdvlBNXvt2l99BfB+AePX6/VDM2EZUGdYRFL0UBzL4UIxpDJtSPcqvuUlKAZzGw==
X-Received: by 10.98.76.206 with SMTP id e75mr11477811pfj.157.1450515720310;
        Sat, 19 Dec 2015 01:02:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.5] (42-148-220-156.rev.home.ne.jp. [42.148.220.156])
        by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q14sm22549833pfa.45.2015.12.19.01.01.58
        for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sat, 19 Dec 2015 01:01:59 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.5582) Interps straw ballot 10
To: WG5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
References: <20151204113209.E2B89358343@www.open-std.org>
From: TAKATA Masayuki <takata@edogawa-u.ac.jp>
Organization: Edogawa University
Message-ID: <56751CFB.701@edogawa-u.ac.jp>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 18:01:47 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20151204113209.E2B89358343@www.open-std.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

Here is my vote.

Yes  No   Number     Title

-Y-  ---  F03/0042  IEEE funny values and Standard real generic intrinsic
                      procedures
-C-  ---  F08/0109  LOCK_TYPE and unlimited polymorphic
-Y-  ---  F08/0145  Can initial-data-target be coindexed?
-C-  ---  F08/0147  Is generic resolution of elemental assignment done
                      at runtime?
-Y-  ---  F08/0148  Pointer subobject in structure constructor in
                      pure procedure

I agree with David's comment on F08/0109 that the new constraint should be numbered as C642a.
I agree with Erik's comments on F08/0109 and F08/0147.

F08/0145:
This is a question, rather than a comment, because time is up.
The edit is:
> [70:3] 4.5.4.6
>
> In the first sentence of C461, insert ", noncoindexed" after
> "nonallocatable" so that the sentence reads:
>
> C461 (R443) The designator shall designate a nonallocatable,
> noncoindexed variable that has the TARGET and SAVE attributes and
> does not have a vector subscript.

Is "a nonallocatable, noncoindexed variable" appropriate as an ISO-style
expression, not "a nonallocatable and noncoindexed variable"?

Regards,

Makki

-- 
Takata, Masayuki: Professor
Edogawa University, 474 Komaki, Nagareyama, Chiba 270-0198 Japan
phone: +81-4-7152-9957(direct)  fax: +81-4-7154-2490(shared)
email: takata@edogawa-u.ac.jp