From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Thu Dec 10 02:06:58 2015
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 286DD35863C; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 02:06:58 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
X-Greylist: delayed 396 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at www5.open-std.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 02:06:56 CET
Received: from nag-j.co.jp (bvdeuz19.secure.ne.jp [180.222.80.19])
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C52913570B5
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 02:06:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: (qmail 39358 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2015 10:00:11 +0900
Received: from unknown (HELO Maru10) (218.42.159.105)
  by 0 with SMTP; 10 Dec 2015 10:00:11 +0900
Message-ID: <3EF5392C5FEE40C29620E2A700F5CF81@Maru10>
From: "Cohen Malcolm" <malcolm@nag-j.co.jp>
To: "WG5" <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
References: <20151209091128.A304035692D@www.open-std.org>
In-Reply-To: <20151209091128.A304035692D@www.open-std.org>
Subject: Re: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.5592) Corrigendum 4
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 10:00:13 +0900
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="UTF-8";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 16.4.3528.331
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V16.4.3528.331
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk


Please answer the following question "Is N088, with the references and
notes removed, acceptable for submission to SC22 for publication as
Corrigendum 4 for Fortran 2008?" in one of these ways.

3) No, for the following reasons.

Based on comments already make, the corrigendum is clearly going to look 
substantially different from this.  I cannot vote in favour of text I have 
not seen.

(For example, Van Snyder's vote on the corrigendum - not on the interps - 
has many changes.)

John Reid writes:
>We originally planned for Corrigendum 4 to be completed in 2014. I am
>determined that completion will not be delayed to 2016.

Completion cannot possibly occur in 2015, so there is no good reason for 
unseemly haste.

Cheers,
-- 
........................Malcolm Cohen, Nihon NAG, Tokyo. 

