From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Thu Dec 10 01:48:49 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id DF829358281; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 01:48:48 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (mailhost.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.139.105]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17BDF3570B5 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 01:48:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from [137.79.7.57] (math.jpl.nasa.gov [137.79.7.57]) by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id tBA0mfAh005890 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128 bits) verified NO) for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 16:48:43 -0800 Subject: Ballot on draft Corrigendum 4 From: Van Snyder Reply-To: Van.Snyder@jpl.nasa.gov To: sc22wg5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Organization: Yes Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 16:48:41 -0800 Message-ID: <1449708521.4024.140.camel@math.jpl.nasa.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 (2.32.3-34.el6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Source-Sender: Van.Snyder@jpl.nasa.gov X-AUTH: Authorized Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk This is a WG5 letter ballot on N2088, the draft Corrigendum 4 for Fortran 2008. It was constructed by David Muxworthy and has been checked by me. The notes in italics will be removed from the final version, as will the references to interpretation numbers and page and line numbers in the standard. Please answer the following question "Is N088, with the references and notes removed, acceptable for submission to SC22 for publication as Corrigendum 4 for Fortran 2008?" in one of these ways. 1) Yes. 2) Yes, but I recommend the following changes. 3) No, for the following reasons. 4) Abstain. I vote 2) Yes, but I recommend the following changes. The number of the constraint introduced at [127:9+] should be C642a. In the paragraph introduced in subclause 6.7.1.2 at [128:15-17], "nonstopped" should be inserted between "all" and "images" at the end of the final sentence. In the paragraph introduced in subclause 6.7.3.2 at [131:16-19], "nonstopped" should be inserted between "all" and "images" at the end of the final sentence. In the paragraph introduced in subclause 8.5.4 at [190:16-], replace "The value of " with "If is not an asterisk, its value" because it doesn't have a value if it is an asterisk. In the paragraph revised in subclause 9.12 at [243:6-7], delete "the" before " processing" because there might be more than one in the statement. In the first line of NOTE 9.64a, replace "denotation"; with "denotation;", and change the final ASCII quotation mark to a typeset final quotation mark. In both instructions for the revision in subclause 14.10 at [408:1-] insert "of" before "Table 14.1" and "Table 14.2".