From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Wed Dec 9 12:54:13 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id F2456357228; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 12:54:12 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org X-Greylist: delayed 310 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at www5.open-std.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 12:54:12 CET Received: from postout2.mail.lrz.de (postout2.mail.lrz.de [129.187.255.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E02E356821 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 12:54:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from lxmhs52.srv.lrz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postout2.mail.lrz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3pFxcK0wdXzySP for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 12:54:09 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: postout.lrz.de (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)" header.d=lrz.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=lrz.de; h= mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type :content-language:accept-language:in-reply-to:references :message-id:date:date:subject:subject:from:from:received :received:received:received; s=postout; t=1449662048; bh=nrB+T8y 1u8hbAz6dM5JiC2p9WcGcCHYy5IbmRlOgqIc=; b=oLlkkl42/c1LsTXmsFkQ8Iw szhYufm+frX+Fgyru8T1mG6Wa/DT05AQDvneMw9nm6OnR3ahtOsUPbI1/Nbf/9jr tJpCXINBz0MSyepdzg5J3AkrRPeuWzOnOstGPauF+PuPlJG7Z6N3g2QmbiR90m9u zO/ehnC8FX6oPZNMUf04pvB+TvyTEnSSpuUrxMrpJg3IjhKOGEDqjwvVCl8CFzkn xHQycHWHtzLmCVJVcw/UQM/XN0TeQnKh99NHpha943l3u5Yy0b2lU0hBzW4dRyjT Mnzk4skpQ0DBxSZ/f2bz8dk9bEe6QW7XAz6hA7Ct56fRd2FClXyXyBKfjE7EjzA= = X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at lrz.de in lxmhs52.srv.lrz.de X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.885 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.885 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, LRZ_DATE_TZ_0000=0.001, LRZ_DKIM_DESTROY_MTA=0.001, LRZ_DMARC_LRZ_FAIL=0.001, LRZ_DMARC_OVERWRITE=0.001, LRZ_ENVFROM_LRZ_S=0.001, LRZ_FROM_AP_PHRASE=0.001, LRZ_FROM_LRZ_S=0.001, LRZ_FROM_PHRASE=0.001, LRZ_FROM_PRE_SUR_ADDR=0.001, LRZ_FWD_MS_EX=0.001, LRZ_HAS_X_ORIG_IP=0.001, LRZ_MSGID_HL32=0.001, LRZ_MSGID_SPAM_68=0.001, LRZ_RCVD_MS_EX=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no Received: from postout2.mail.lrz.de ([127.0.0.1]) by lxmhs52.srv.lrz.de (lxmhs52.srv.lrz.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 20024) with LMTP id JQdPvNZzOixM for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 12:54:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from BADWLRZ-SW13MB1.ads.mwn.de (BADWLRZ-SW13MB1.ads.mwn.de [IPv6:2001:4ca0:0:108::155]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "BADWLRZ-SW13MB1", Issuer "BADWLRZ-SW13MB1" (not verified)) by postout2.mail.lrz.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3pFxcJ3xy7zySM for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 12:54:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from BADWLRZ-SWMBX01.ads.mwn.de (2001:4ca0:0:108::157) by BADWLRZ-SW13MB1.ads.mwn.de (2001:4ca0:0:108::155) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1130.7; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 12:54:07 +0100 Received: from BADWLRZ-SWMBX01.ads.mwn.de ([fe80::9d46:d25e:8d12:6786]) by BADWLRZ-SWMBX01.ads.mwn.de ([fe80::9d46:d25e:8d12:6786%12]) with mapi id 15.00.1130.005; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 12:54:07 +0100 From: "Bader, Reinhold" To: "sc22wg5@open-std.org" Subject: AW: (SC22WG5.5593) Corrigendum 4 Thread-Topic: (SC22WG5.5593) Corrigendum 4 Thread-Index: AQHRMmydBiTWcCVeEkOieK1jUPM2kJ7Cixrw Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 11:54:07 +0000 Message-ID: <7848c663bdb04cc5a6bb0c0f7fb0c696@BADWLRZ-SWMBX01.ads.mwn.de> References: <20151209103022.C93A7357313@www.open-std.org> In-Reply-To: <20151209103022.C93A7357313@www.open-std.org> Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US Content-Language: de-DE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [2001:4ca0:0:f031::2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk > Please answer the following question "Is N088, with the references and > notes removed, acceptable for submission to SC22 for publication as > Corrigendum 4 for Fortran 2008?" in one of these ways. > 1) Yes. > 2) Yes, but I recommend the following changes. > 3) No, for the following reasons. > 4) Abstain. >=20 My vote is 1) Yes. Regards Reinhold