From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Wed Dec  9 11:54:27 2015
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 20F793588EF; Wed,  9 Dec 2015 11:54:27 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
X-Greylist: delayed 488 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at www5.open-std.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 11:54:26 CET
Received: from smtp-out-11.tiscali.co.uk (smtp-out-11.tiscali.co.uk [62.24.139.98])
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B31A93572EC
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Wed,  9 Dec 2015 11:54:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.1.8] ([80.47.119.202])
	by smtp.talktalk.net with SMTP
	id 6cGDa4vcmn92V6cGDadjnw; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 10:46:13 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [80.47.119.202]
Cc: John Reid <John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk>
To: WG5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
From: John Reid <John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk>
Subject: WG5 straw ballot on draft Corrigendum 4
Message-ID: <56680679.5050209@tiscali.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 10:46:17 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/42.0 SeaMonkey/2.39
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfGWCPSP1ZOXwCN9LCVkR5BhCvNKmXaaqe4iPdjKf2gtz8Ax0ObZskqxmuigu5Y5pjWgZrtKncaBL4nukT3lMoWqHklwpHYZ1q873cqOfZz/FLlA9Nm+I
 +druo5ARJvMhP+SqD1ILvmKhMSoiALaaBvoWn7nfCOmC4YI9S6ZemUldVhtHTjmITiGmTQRW+YoX2m1exQDvZBkfXu4TcOQfC94=
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk


Please answer the following question "Is N088, with the references and
notes removed, acceptable for submission to SC22 for publication as
Corrigendum 4 for Fortran 2008?" in one of these ways.

1) Yes.

John.


P.S. There is a typo in the question. "N088" should be "N2088". Please 
ignore this typo. ISO rules mean that I cannot correct this except by 
withdrawing the paper and issuing a new one, which does not seem worth 
doing.
