From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Sat Dec  5 12:21:03 2015
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 60F9B35863C; Sat,  5 Dec 2015 12:21:03 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
X-Greylist: delayed 490 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at www5.open-std.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 12:21:03 CET
Received: from smtp-out-12.tiscali.co.uk (smtp-out-12.tiscali.co.uk [62.24.139.99])
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 266F83568F5
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Sat,  5 Dec 2015 12:21:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([88.104.243.138])
	by smtp.talktalk.net with SMTP
	id 5AlmawohW7j0K5AlmaWonV; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 11:12:50 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [88.104.243.138]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.5582) Interps straw ballot 10
From: David Muxworthy <d.muxworthy@bcs.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20151204113209.E2B89358343@www.open-std.org>
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 11:12:49 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <B0DC2123-16A1-453E-966F-3E081081F0B6@bcs.org.uk>
References: <20151204113209.E2B89358343@www.open-std.org>
To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfIdNKS6hcbGh88ipF/svfeg3jl8WjBBXXzEV+UvwKukcFvSo8ErIevL4TArQnoDejoarsCquLEAyjXUkbAFdb+le89IRR+7H6PIU3y46HGMl1LEtD6om
 TunQq8V8Hikg9ZdPnRwfSch31kbar50s4/r84AplDYByjimXT/HuFld17Pu18UqSvD4N870z02QZgQ==
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

Yes  No   Number     Title

-Y-  ---  F03/0042  IEEE funny values and Standard real generic intrinsic
                     procedures
-C-  ---  F08/0109  LOCK_TYPE and unlimited polymorphic
-Y-  ---  F08/0145  Can initial-data-target be coindexed?
-Y-  ---  F08/0147  Is generic resolution of elemental assignment done
                     at runtime?
-Y-  ---  F08/0148  Pointer subobject in structure constructor in
                     pure procedure

Comment on F08/0109

Either the new constraint should be numbered 642a to be consistent with
the practice used for other constraints added by corrigenda, or the edit
should be at [127:10+].

David Muxworthy

