From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Wed Sep 23 23:58:07 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 398BF358295; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 23:58:07 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from out.ipsmtp1nec.opaltelecom.net (out.ipsmtp1nec.opaltelecom.net [62.24.202.73]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85324356634 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 23:58:01 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2GVAQBgHwNW/8p3L1ANUMxMEAEBAQEBAQEDc4RiMGIhAgQNAkwNCAK/BXGQCIQwAQsBH4ZzjHqBQwWSPoMpgkuBXYhjjwEBjCg4gjwcgVWKXAEBAQ X-IPAS-Result: A2GVAQBgHwNW/8p3L1ANUMxMEAEBAQEBAQEDc4RiMGIhAgQNAkwNCAK/BXGQCIQwAQsBH4ZzjHqBQwWSPoMpgkuBXYhjjwEBjCg4gjwcgVWKXAEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,579,1437433200"; d="txt'?scan'208";a="759757872" Received: from host-80-47-119-202.as13285.net (HELO [192.168.1.8]) ([80.47.119.202]) by out.ipsmtp1nec.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 23 Sep 2015 22:58:00 +0100 To: WG5 From: John Reid Subject: UK-21 OUT_OF_RANGE Message-ID: <56032064.20100@stfc.ac.uk> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 22:57:56 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/38.0 SeaMonkey/2.35 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------070903070605070203070406" Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070903070605070203070406 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear all, David and Bill have independently found a mistake in last year's papers. The minutes of the 2014 meeting (N2020) record two straw votes on UK-21. The first was undecided, 3-4-7, and the second was in favour, 9-2-4. A mistake was made in N2023, which recorded the first vote and a decision not to include UK-21 in the revision. Of course, the second vote supersedes the first and is the one on which we should act. To rectify this, I propose to supersede N2078 by N2082 (draft attached). I have taken the opportunity to mention that J3/14-168r4 contains the edits for UK-18. Does anyone have any objection to this? Cheers, John. --------------070903070605070203070406 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; name="N2082-3.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="N2082-3.txt" ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgSVNPL0lFQyBKVEMxL1ND MjIvV0c1IE4yMDgyLTMKCkNvbXBsZXRlIGxpc3Qgb2YgZmVhdHVyZXMgdG8gYmUgaW5jbHVk ZWQgaW4gbmV4dCByZXZpc2lvbiwgc3VwZXJzZWRpbmcgTjIwNzggIAogICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgSm9obiBSZWlkLCAyMyBTZXB0ZW1i ZXIgMjAxNQoKV0c1IGRlY2lkZWQgYXQgaXRzIDIwMTUgbWVldGluZyB0aGF0IHRoZSBmb2xs b3dpbmcgZmVhdHVyZXMgd2lsbCBiZSBpbmNsdWRlZCAKaW4gdGhlIG5leHQgcmV2aXNpb24g b2YgdGhlIEZvcnRyYW4gc3RhbmRhcmQsIHRvIGJlIGtub3duIGluZm9ybWFsbHkgYXMgCkZv cnRyYW4gMjAxNS4gCgpJU08vSUVDIFRTIDI5MTEzIEZ1cnRoZXIgSW50ZXJvcGVyYWJpbGl0 eSBvZiBGb3J0cmFuIHdpdGggQwpJU08vSUVDIFRTIDE4NTA4IEFkZGl0aW9uYWwgUGFyYWxs ZWwgRmVhdHVyZXMgaW4gRm9ydHJhbgpUaGUgZmVhdHVyZXMgbGlzdGVkIGluIElTTy9JRUMg SlRDMS9TQzIyL1dHNSBOMTk4MgpUaGUgZmVhdHVyZXMgbGlzdGVkIGluIElTTy9JRUMgSlRD MS9TQzIyL1dHNSBOMjAyMywgbm90aW5nIHRoYXQgdGhlIGVkaXRzCiAgICAgIGZvciBVSy0x OCBhcmUgaW4gSjMvMTQtMTY4cjQuClVLLTIxIEozLzE0LTE4M3IyIENoZWNrIGZvciB3aGV0 aGVyIHZhbHVlcyBvZiBvbmUgaW50cmluc2ljIHR5cGUgY2FuIGJlCiAgICAgIGNvbnZlcnRl ZCB0byBhbm90aGVyIHdpdGhvdXQgZXJyb3IgKGluIE4yMDIzLCB0aGlzIHdhcyBpbmFkdmVy dGVudGx5IAogICAgICBwbGFjZWQgaW4gdGhlIHNldCBvZiBmZWF0dXJlcyBub3QgYWNjZXB0 ZWQpLiAKVGhlIGZlYXR1cmVzIGxpc3RlZCBpbiBJU08vSUVDIEpUQzEvU0MyMi9XRzUgTjIw NzMsIHdpdGggVUstMjMgbW9kaWZpZWQgdG8KICAgIGFsbG93IGNvbnRyb2wgb2YgdGhlIG91 dHB1dCBmcm9tIFNUT1Agb3IgRVJST1IgU1RPUCAoc2VlIEozLzE1LTE5MnIyKS4K --------------070903070605070203070406--