From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Wed Sep 16 00:56:56 2015
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 2EF00358262; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:56:56 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (mailhost.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.139.109])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C9F35688C
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:56:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [137.79.7.57] (math.jpl.nasa.gov [137.79.7.57])
	by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id t8FMujA9006191
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128 bits) verified NO)
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 15:56:46 -0700
Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5562)  LCPC conference in Raleigh
From: Van Snyder <Van.Snyder@jpl.nasa.gov>
Reply-To: Van.Snyder@jpl.nasa.gov
To: sc22wg5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
In-Reply-To: <6C79E566-1406-4336-8A44-40190B6B24A6@cray.com>
References: <20150915023108.BA4D6357225@www.open-std.org>
	 <0B2E6F4E-134C-4142-B0BC-3EFE6BCA0458@cray.com>
	 <20150915204333.E678F358262@www.open-std.org>
	 <6C79E566-1406-4336-8A44-40190B6B24A6@cray.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Organization: Yes
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 15:56:45 -0700
Message-ID: <1442357805.13944.204.camel@math.jpl.nasa.gov>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 (2.32.3-34.el6) 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Source-Sender: Van.Snyder@jpl.nasa.gov
X-AUTH: Authorized
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 22:44 +0000, Bill Long wrote:
> 
> > One of the presenters (it might have been Hadia Ahmed) described
> persistent MPI transactions.  Does anybody's coarray implementation
> use this (or its equivalent in a different transport mechanism)?
> 
> 
> I don’t understand what you mean by a “persistent” “transaction”.  

These are described at
http://www.mpi-forum.org/docs/mpi-2.1/mpi21-report/node63.htm.


