From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Thu Aug 20 23:46:59 2015
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id E903E9DB116; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 23:46:58 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from out.ipsmtp1nec.opaltelecom.net (out.ipsmtp1nec.opaltelecom.net [62.24.202.73])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75361356679
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 23:46:54 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2CVAQC2SdZV/8p3L1ANULAvm3UQAQEBAQEBAYVXDwEFGyU2AgUWCwILAwIBAgFLCgMIAsFOcZEEhTuBIpIrgUMFjGOIRnCLf5o7hCSDPAEBAQ
X-IPAS-Result: A2CVAQC2SdZV/8p3L1ANULAvm3UQAQEBAQEBAYVXDwEFGyU2AgUWCwILAwIBAgFLCgMIAsFOcZEEhTuBIpIrgUMFjGOIRnCLf5o7hCSDPAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,717,1432594800"; 
   d="scan'208";a="721570542"
Received: from host-80-47-119-202.as13285.net (HELO [192.168.1.8]) ([80.47.119.202])
  by out.ipsmtp1nec.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 20 Aug 2015 22:46:53 +0100
Message-ID: <55D64ACB.5090007@stfc.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 22:46:51 +0100
From: John Reid <John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/36.0 SeaMonkey/2.33.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: WG5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
Subject: Straw interps ballot from Mark LeAir and Bob Scollard
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

Mark and I went through the list and here is our vote on the straw ballot.



Yes  No   Number     Title

-Y-  --- F08/0105   Is the ASYNCHRONOUS attribute allowed with the

                     VALUE attribute?

-C-  --- F08/0110   Interdependence of specifier values in input/output

                     statements

-Y-  --- F08/0115   ASYNCHRONOUS and argument passing

-Y-  --- F08/0116   Interoperable procedures

-Y-  --- F08/0117   TARGET and coindexed arguments

-Y-  --- F08/0118   Subobject of variable in variable definition context

-Y-  --- F08/0119   Branching to END BLOCK and END CRITICAL

-Y-  --- F08/0120   Is the name of a procedure pointer a local identifier?

-Y-  --- F08/0121   Add to introduction defined operations in specification

                    exprs

-C-  --- F08/0122   Types with coarray components

-Y-  --- F08/0123   SPACING intrinsic

-Y-  --- F08/0124   Coindexed object with polymorphic subcomponent

-Y-  --- F08/0126  Can cobounds be referenced in the same type

                   declaration?

-Y-  --- F08/0127  May an initial line begin with a semicolon?

-Y-  --- F08/0129  Is CLASS(type) required to refer to a prior type

                   definition?

-Y-  --- F08/0130  Does coarray allocation sync even with stopped

                   images?

-Y-  --- F08/0131  Are the changes to C_LOC in the 2010 revision

                   intentional?

-Y-  --- F08/0132  Can a procedure pointer be declared with an

                   interface block?

-Y-  --- F08/0133  Is unallocated actual associated with

                   nonallocatable dummy OK?

-Y-  --- F08/0134  <stat-variable> in an image control statement

-C-  --- F08/0135  Vector subscripted actual makes VALUE dummy

                   undefinable?

-Y-  --- F08/0136  Argument correspondence with VALUE and

                  ASYNCHRONOUS

-Y-  --- F08/0137  Result of TRANSFER when MOLD is an array with

                   element size zero



COMMENTS



F08/0110   Agree with John’s comment

F08/0122   Agree with John’s comment

F08/0135   Agree with John’s comment





Bob Scollard

PGI/NVIDIA