From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Thu Aug 20 15:05:22 2015
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 4DF0B9DB117; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 15:05:22 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from out.ipsmtp3nec.opaltelecom.net (out.ipsmtp3nec.opaltelecom.net [62.24.202.75])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2C579DB115
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 15:05:18 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2ClAQAc0NVV/8p3L1ANUId9xBsQAQEBAQEBAYUvBCQVGyU2AgUWCwILAwIBAgFLDQgCiCK4cHGQcYU7gSKSK4FDBZUpjG+BSoQulEOEJIM8AQEB
X-IPAS-Result: A2ClAQAc0NVV/8p3L1ANUId9xBsQAQEBAQEBAYUvBCQVGyU2AgUWCwILAwIBAgFLDQgCiCK4cHGQcYU7gSKSK4FDBZUpjG+BSoQulEOEJIM8AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,714,1432594800"; 
   d="scan'208";a="722603001"
Received: from host-80-47-119-202.as13285.net (HELO [192.168.1.8]) ([80.47.119.202])
  by out.ipsmtp3nec.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 20 Aug 2015 14:05:17 +0100
Message-ID: <55D5D08B.3010401@stfc.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:05:15 +0100
From: John Reid <John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/36.0 SeaMonkey/2.33.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: WG5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
Subject: WG5 straw ballot on draft TS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

 > Please answer the following question "Is N2074 suitable for 
forwarding to
 > ISO for publication?" in one of these ways.
 >
 > 1) Yes.
 > 2) Yes, but I recommend the following changes.
 > 3) No, for the following reasons.
 > 4) Abstain.
 >

My reply:

1) Yes

John.