From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Wed Aug 19 19:31:00 2015
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id DE1953586F7; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 19:31:00 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
X-Greylist: delayed 386 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at www5.open-std.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 19:31:00 CEST
Received: from postout2.mail.lrz.de (postout2.mail.lrz.de [129.187.255.138])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D3DB35689A
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 19:30:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from lxmhs52.srv.lrz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by postout2.mail.lrz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3mxGFB6rwYzyTN;
	Wed, 19 Aug 2015 19:24:30 +0200 (CEST)
Authentication-Results: postout.lrz.de (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
	reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)" header.d=lrz.de
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=lrz.de; h=
	mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type
	:content-language:accept-language:message-id:date:date:subject
	:subject:from:from:received:received:received:received; s=
	postout; t=1440005070; bh=aBstW6vydnvGCYoCLGTZmkTQIsMn8oEPPrQjS8
	YlxvI=; b=TEhm5b/pC8L1Ou/22UgS4FLE4C1j0Qr1Bq+8NiP7PgXok3zoeUcwSP
	2TyST7yvdrne8BwB8Kce520ZmTUN0kQp0kyQAfl71OC4v1qiOjnxANhccNpP+T74
	KYxG3jB9SC7t2JacxefQW3QPzy7R39UwwfXV4M1oR2h3X1As28s+306N7euaYd16
	HEt4fVYoLRTFa0yBZWFr1NP1Ib7qZ16TSFeESbO3TWxHedSsBHd8bMPzIy+KypLF
	zoqM0vwR8QRLjIDwVCHzQib4G9z3Q7WePIKWKv8DAy2Ck1wU6gvGY93NILg+Zrs8
	FahO9OI3UZmxmMCQroVO+90Sr9ZQcJOw==
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at lrz.de in lxmhs52.srv.lrz.de
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.888
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.888 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, LRZ_DATE_TZ_0000=0.001,
	LRZ_DKIM_DESTROY_MTA=0.001, LRZ_DMARC_OVERWRITE=0.001,
	LRZ_FROM_AP_PHRASE=0.001, LRZ_FROM_PHRASE=0.001,
	LRZ_FROM_PRE_SUR_ADDR=0.001, LRZ_FWD_MS_EX=0.001,
	LRZ_HAS_X_ORIG_IP=0.001, LRZ_MSGID_HL32=0.001,
	LRZ_MSGID_SPAM_68=0.001, LRZ_RCVD_MS_EX=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001]
	autolearn=no
Received: from postout2.mail.lrz.de ([127.0.0.1])
	by lxmhs52.srv.lrz.de (lxmhs52.srv.lrz.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 20024)
	with LMTP id buqL3rZc6cXG; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 19:24:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from BADWLRZ-SW13MB2.ads.mwn.de (BADWLRZ-SW13MB2.ads.mwn.de [IPv6:2001:4ca0:0:108::156])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "BADWLRZ-SW13MB2", Issuer "BADWLRZ-SW13MB2" (not verified))
	by postout2.mail.lrz.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3mxGFB3pV9zyTM;
	Wed, 19 Aug 2015 19:24:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from BADWLRZ-SW13MB5.ads.mwn.de (2001:4ca0:0:108::153) by
 BADWLRZ-SW13MB2.ads.mwn.de (2001:4ca0:0:108::156) with Microsoft SMTP Server
 (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 19:24:29 +0200
Received: from BADWLRZ-SW13MB5.ads.mwn.de ([fe80::ad58:b079:aa60:643a]) by
 BADWLRZ-SW13MB5.ads.mwn.de ([fe80::ad58:b079:aa60:643a%12]) with mapi id
 15.00.1104.000; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 19:24:29 +0200
From: "Bader, Reinhold" <Reinhold.Bader@lrz.de>
To: WG5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
CC: "coarray discussion e-mail list (coarray-ts@mailman.j3-fortran.org)"
	<coarray-ts@mailman.j3-fortran.org>
Subject: Re: WG5 straw ballot on draft TS
Thread-Topic: Re: WG5 straw ballot on draft TS
Thread-Index: AdDao8XT7HE+9kcwTjKbVqgGw/s3og==
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:24:29 +0000
Message-ID: <fbe1f0f8d3e146949bad670f9304277e@BADWLRZ-SW13MB5.ads.mwn.de>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [2001:4ca0:0:f031::1]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

N2079 asks:

Please answer the following question "Is N2074 suitable for forwarding to=20
ISO for publication?" in one of these ways.=20

1) Yes.
2) Yes, but I recommend the following changes.=20
3) No, for the following reasons.
4) Abstain.

My answer is

1) Yes.

Cheers
Reinhold



