From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Tue Aug 18 23:15:37 2015
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 6F69C9DB115; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 23:15:37 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
X-Greylist: delayed 650 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at www5.open-std.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 23:15:35 CEST
Received: from esa2.cray.iphmx.com (esa2.cray.iphmx.com [68.232.143.164])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A954356634
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 23:15:35 +0200 (CEST)
DomainKey-Signature: s=cray1024; d=cray.com; c=nofws; q=dns;
  h=X-IronPort-AV:X-Cray-OBMMKR:Received:Received:Received:
   From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:
   Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach:
   X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:x-originating-ip:Content-Type:
   Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:
   Return-Path;
  b=nF4fRMfj2wvyO+NIx0dorOh4uQIfP5gMMArWUgUlKpBkxjKoonL0NoWf
   V5F3mfVz25eKzvIXvbRl2bAQiNAh41lPoNcRQEyhVuWuwYQsMgpNVxm5G
   R2D/ven4Xefu4LFb6FbfujVEX6sL/U5WQiCEU7SDewcK1cw9m/R9H1Y52
   c=;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;
  d=cray.com; i=@cray.com; q=dns/txt; s=cray1024;
  t=1439932539; x=1471468539;
  h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-id:
   content-transfer-encoding:mime-version;
  bh=0EsQRiett5iNhOcSmFTj0M3Y/qCgbQyP3wDmpe9Ns18=;
  b=0YbRiZ1P366nWR1FZEGwHskE2jzY2kSBz9aWJdPd27phb66eTzIqAaZB
   m3OWaG0noLfeVy36v7gwVeHerRBZguh14x4G8w6Q8LCanm6WpF85CigNQ
   /qut+2s/k/ltcAOkwkBEeQCeoOs3KwLxIuYrtmBDXmq7HIDCm4vOvZx9Y
   o=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,704,1432594800"; 
   d="scan'208";a="3418909"
X-Cray-OBMMKR: 1433258124
Received: from cray-smtp-2.cray.com (HELO CFWEX01.americas.cray.com) ([136.162.34.11])
  by esa2.cray.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 18 Aug 2015 22:04:40 +0100
Received: from CFWEXHYBRID.americas.cray.com (172.30.88.178) by
 CFWEX01.americas.cray.com (172.30.88.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id
 14.3.224.2; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 16:04:38 -0500
Received: from CFWEX01.americas.cray.com ([169.254.1.172]) by
 cfwexhybrid.americas.cray.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Tue, 18
 Aug 2015 16:04:37 -0500
From: Bill Long <longb@cray.com>
To: WG5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
Subject: Interp straw ballot
Thread-Topic: Interp straw ballot
Thread-Index: AQHQ2fl92Q0muCjai0O7fsye/phmdQ==
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 21:04:37 +0000
Message-ID: <A69C3053-6CD0-4CD2-9BBD-4C4EC48DFFF5@cray.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.31.22.59]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <D1F5B956B5F26342A79A77FE2D162141@cray.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk


The following Fortran 2008 interpretations are being balloted:

Yes  No   Number     Title
-Y-  --- F08/0105   Is the ASYNCHRONOUS attribute allowed with the
                    VALUE attribute?
-C-  --- F08/0110   Interdependence of specifier values in input/output
                    statements
-Y-  --- F08/0115   ASYNCHRONOUS and argument passing
-Y-  --- F08/0116   Interoperable procedures
-Y-  --- F08/0117   TARGET and coindexed arguments
-Y-  --- F08/0118   Subobject of variable in variable definition context
-Y-  --- F08/0119   Branching to END BLOCK and END CRITICAL
-Y-  --- F08/0120   Is the name of a procedure pointer a local identifier?
-Y-  --- F08/0121   Add to introduction defined operations in specification
                   exprs
-C-  --- F08/0122   Types with coarray components
-Y-  --- F08/0123   SPACING intrinsic
-Y-  --- F08/0124   Coindexed object with polymorphic subcomponent
-Y-  --- F08/0126  Can cobounds be referenced in the same type
                  declaration?
-Y-  --- F08/0127  May an initial line begin with a semicolon?
-C-  --- F08/0129  Is CLASS(type) required to refer to a prior type
                  definition?
-Y-  --- F08/0130  Does coarray allocation sync even with stopped
                  images?
-Y-  --- F08/0131  Are the changes to C_LOC in the 2010 revision
                  intentional?
-Y-  --- F08/0132  Can a procedure pointer be declared with an
                  interface block?
-Y-  --- F08/0133  Is unallocated actual associated with
                  nonallocatable dummy OK?
-Y-  --- F08/0134  <stat-variable> in an image control statement
-Y-  --- F08/0135  Vector subscripted actual makes VALUE dummy
                  undefinable?
-Y-  --- F08/0136  Argument correspondence with VALUE and
                  ASYNCHRONOUS
-Y-  --- F08/0137  Result of TRANSFER when MOLD is an array with
                  element size zero


Comments:

F08/0110 - [Not in Edits] - Agree with Daniel Chen that "OPEN" should
           be "OPENED" in the Answer 1.

F08/0122 - Agree with John Reid that the instruction part of the final
           edit needs a verb, and agree with John's proposed change.

F08/0129 - Agree with John Reid that the edit citation should be
           10-007r1:[52:6+] rather than 12-007:6+.


Cheers,
Bill



Bill Long                                                                  =
     longb@cray.com
Fortran Technical Support  &                                  voice:  651-6=
05-9024
Bioinformatics Software Development                     fax:  651-605-9142
Cray Inc./ Cray Plaza, Suite 210/ 380 Jackson St./ St. Paul, MN 55101


