From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Tue Aug 18 06:27:41 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 2621C35689C; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 06:27:40 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C06CF356821 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 06:27:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Aug 2015 21:27:38 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,699,1432623600"; d="scan'208,217";a="770778958" Received: from orsmsx102.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.225.129]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Aug 2015 21:27:37 -0700 Received: from orsmsx161.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.240.84) by ORSMSX102.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.225.129) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 21:27:36 -0700 Received: from orsmsx103.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.193]) by ORSMSX161.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.153]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 21:27:36 -0700 From: "Whitlock, Stan" To: WG5 Subject: RE: N2061 - WG5 straw ballot 9 on Fortran 2008 interpretations Thread-Topic: RE: N2061 - WG5 straw ballot 9 on Fortran 2008 interpretations Thread-Index: AdDZbdRAOVhf5319RtuC1FPCctS3Sw== Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 04:27:35 +0000 Message-ID: <4AA982B1265F43408480F737BE12F4D36FABBB44@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.22.254.140] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4AA982B1265F43408480F737BE12F4D36FABBB44ORSMSX103amrcor_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk --_000_4AA982B1265F43408480F737BE12F4D36FABBB44ORSMSX103amrcor_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Here is my vote on N2061 - WG5 straw ballot 9 on Fortran 2008 interpretatio= ns: ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG5 N2061 WG5 straw ballot 9 on Fortran 2008 interpretations John Reid, 21 July 2015 This is the ninth WG5 vote on a set of draft interpretations for Fortran 2008. They have all been approved in a J3 letter ballot. The following Fortran 2008 interpretations are being balloted: Yes No Number Title -Y- --- F08/0105 Is the ASYNCHRONOUS attribute allowed with the VALUE attribute? -Y- --- F08/0110 Interdependence of specifier values in input/output statements -Y- --- F08/0115 ASYNCHRONOUS and argument passing -Y- --- F08/0116 Interoperable procedures -Y- --- F08/0117 TARGET and coindexed arguments -Y- --- F08/0118 Subobject of variable in variable definition context -Y- --- F08/0119 Branching to END BLOCK and END CRITICAL -Y- --- F08/0120 Is the name of a procedure pointer a local identifier? -Y- --- F08/0121 Add to introduction defined operations in specification exprs -Y- --- F08/0122 Types with coarray components -Y- --- F08/0123 SPACING intrinsic -Y- --- F08/0124 Coindexed object with polymorphic subcomponent -Y- --- F08/0126 Can cobounds be referenced in the same type declaration? -Y- --- F08/0127 May an initial line begin with a semicolon? -Y- --- F08/0129 Is CLASS(type) required to refer to a prior type definition? -Y- --- F08/0130 Does coarray allocation sync even with stopped images? -Y- --- F08/0131 Are the changes to C_LOC in the 2010 revision intentional? -Y- --- F08/0132 Can a procedure pointer be declared with an interface block? -Y- --- F08/0133 Is unallocated actual associated with nonallocatable dummy OK? -Y- --- F08/0134 in an image control statement -Y- --- F08/0135 Vector subscripted actual makes VALUE dummy undefinable? -Y- --- F08/0136 Argument correspondence with VALUE and ASYNCHRONOUS -Y- --- F08/0137 Result of TRANSFER when MOLD is an array with element size zero Thanks /Stan Whitlock Intel Corp --_000_4AA982B1265F43408480F737BE12F4D36FABBB44ORSMSX103amrcor_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Here is my vote on N2061 - WG5 straw ballot 9 on For= tran 2008 interpretations:

 

        &nbs= p;            &= nbsp;           &nbs= p;           ISO/IEC JTC1= /SC22/WG5 N2061

 

        &nbs= p; WG5 straw ballot 9 on Fortran 2008 interpretations

        &nbs= p;             = John Reid, 21 July 2015

 

This is the ninth WG5 vote on a set of draft interpr= etations for Fortran

2008. They have all been approved in a J3 letter bal= lot. 

 

The following Fortran 2008 interpretations are being= balloted:

 

Yes  No   Number   &nb= sp; Title

-Y-  --- F08/0105   Is the ASYNCHRONO= US attribute allowed with the

        &nbs= p;           VALUE attrib= ute?

-Y-  --- F08/0110   Interdependence o= f specifier values in input/output

        &nbs= p;           statements

-Y-  --- F08/0115   ASYNCHRONOUS and = argument passing

-Y-  --- F08/0116   Interoperable pro= cedures

-Y-  --- F08/0117   TARGET and coinde= xed arguments

-Y-  --- F08/0118   Subobject of vari= able in variable definition context

-Y-  --- F08/0119   Branching to END = BLOCK and END CRITICAL

-Y-  --- F08/0120   Is the name of a = procedure pointer a local identifier?

-Y-  --- F08/0121   Add to introducti= on defined operations in specification

        &nbs= p;          exprs

-Y-  --- F08/0122   Types with coarra= y components

-Y-  --- F08/0123   SPACING intrinsic=

-Y-  --- F08/0124   Coindexed object = with polymorphic subcomponent

-Y-  --- F08/0126  Can cobounds be referen= ced in the same type

        &nbs= p;         declaration?<= /p>

-Y-  --- F08/0127  May an initial line beg= in with a semicolon?

-Y-  --- F08/0129  Is CLASS(type) required= to refer to a prior type

        &nbs= p;         definition?

-Y-  --- F08/0130  Does coarray allocation= sync even with stopped

        &nbs= p;         images?

-Y-  --- F08/0131  Are the changes to C_LO= C in the 2010 revision

        &nbs= p;         intentional?<= /p>

-Y-  --- F08/0132  Can a procedure pointer= be declared with an

        &nbs= p;         interface block?

-Y-  --- F08/0133  Is unallocated actual a= ssociated with

        &nbs= p;         nonallocatable dummy OK?=

-Y-  --- F08/0134  <stat-variable> i= n an image control statement

-Y-  --- F08/0135  Vector subscripted actu= al makes VALUE dummy

        &nbs= p;         undefinable?<= /p>

-Y-  --- F08/0136  Argument correspondence= with VALUE and

        &nbs= p;         ASYNCHRONOUS<= /p>

-Y-  --- F08/0137  Result of TRANSFER when= MOLD is an array with

        &nbs= p;         element size zero

 

Thanks

/Stan Whitlock

Intel Corp       =              &n= bsp;    

--_000_4AA982B1265F43408480F737BE12F4D36FABBB44ORSMSX103amrcor_--