From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Tue Aug 18 04:40:24 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 4FED635689C; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 04:40:24 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org X-Greylist: delayed 3627 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at www5.open-std.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 04:40:23 CEST Received: from st11p02im-asmtp001.me.com (st11p02im-asmtp001.me.com [17.172.220.113]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA857356821 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 04:40:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.0.1.19] (c-73-217-17-133.hsd1.co.comcast.net [73.217.17.133]) by st11p02im-asmtp001.me.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.35.0 64bit (built Mar 31 2015)) with ESMTPSA id <0NT9005HH8MBOY10@st11p02im-asmtp001.me.com> for sc22wg5@open-std.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 01:39:48 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.14.151,1.0.33,0.0.0000 definitions=2015-08-18_01:2015-08-17,2015-08-17,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1412110000 definitions=main-1508180028 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5535) WG5 straw ballot on draft TS From: Dan Nagle In-reply-to: <67A5BFE6-0496-4F98-9360-5FFEE424B8DF@cray.com> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 19:39:47 -0600 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Message-id: <899E03C4-FABF-41F5-BC53-20D3920C9EB2@mac.com> References: <20150814170931.B41963572EE@www.open-std.org> <67A5BFE6-0496-4F98-9360-5FFEE424B8DF@cray.com> To: WG5 List X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk Hi, > Please answer the following question "Is N2074 suitable for forwarding to > ISO for publication?" in one of these ways. > > 1) Yes. > 2) Yes, but I recommend the following changes. > 3) No, for the following reasons. > 4) Abstain. I vote 1) Yes. -- Cheers! Dan Nagle