From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Mon Aug 17 16:51:53 2015
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id EF848358659; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 16:51:52 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from ppsw-51.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-51.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.151])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 139F0356DBC
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 16:51:46 +0200 (CEST)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.51]:38466)
	by ppsw-51.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.159]:25)
	with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:nmm1) id 1ZRLlJ-0001pj-Y3 (Exim 4.82_3-c0e5623)
	(return-path <nmm1@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Mon, 17 Aug 2015 15:51:45 +0100
Received: from prayer by hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk)
	with local (PRAYER:nmm1) id 1ZRLlJ-0004h7-Fe (Exim 4.72)
	(return-path <nmm1@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Mon, 17 Aug 2015 15:51:45 +0100
Received: from [131.111.56.53] by old-webmail.hermes.cam.ac.uk
	with HTTP (Prayer-1.3.5); 17 Aug 2015 15:51:45 +0100
Date: 17 Aug 2015 15:51:45 +0100
From: "N.M. Maclaren" <nmm1@cam.ac.uk>
To: John Reid <John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk>
Cc: WG5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
Subject: Re: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.5525) Interps for WG5 vote
Message-ID: <Prayer.1.3.5.1508171551450.17726@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20150721193002.60A0A358784@www.open-std.org>
References: <20150721193002.60A0A358784@www.open-std.org>
X-Mailer: Prayer v1.3.5
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

Yes  No   Number     Title
-Y-  --- F08/0105   Is the ASYNCHRONOUS attribute allowed with the
                    VALUE attribute?
-Y-  --- F08/0110   Interdependence of specifier values in input/output
                    statements
-Y-  --- F08/0115   ASYNCHRONOUS and argument passing
-Y-  --- F08/0116   Interoperable procedures
-Y-  --- F08/0117   TARGET and coindexed arguments
-Y-  --- F08/0118   Subobject of variable in variable definition context
-Y-  --- F08/0119   Branching to END BLOCK and END CRITICAL
-Y-  --- F08/0120   Is the name of a procedure pointer a local identifier?
-Y-  --- F08/0121   Add to introduction defined operations in specification
                   exprs
-Y-  --- F08/0122   Types with coarray components
-Y-  --- F08/0123   SPACING intrinsic
-Y-  --- F08/0124   Coindexed object with polymorphic subcomponent
-Y-  --- F08/0126  Can cobounds be referenced in the same type
                  declaration?
-Y-  --- F08/0127  May an initial line begin with a semicolon?
-Y-  --- F08/0129  Is CLASS(type) required to refer to a prior type
                  definition?
---  --- F08/0130  Does coarray allocation sync even with stopped
                  images?
-Y-  --- F08/0131  Are the changes to C_LOC in the 2010 revision
                  intentional?
-Y-  --- F08/0132  Can a procedure pointer be declared with an
                  interface block?
-Y-  --- F08/0133  Is unallocated actual associated with
                  nonallocatable dummy OK?
-Y-  --- F08/0134  <stat-variable> in an image control statement
-Y-  --- F08/0135  Vector subscripted actual makes VALUE dummy
                  undefinable?
-Y-  --- F08/0136  Argument correspondence with VALUE and
                  ASYNCHRONOUS
-Y-  --- F08/0137  Result of TRANSFER when MOLD is an array with
                  element size zero