From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Fri Apr 24 11:39:00 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 6A84C358721; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 11:39:00 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org X-Greylist: delayed 1392 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at www5.open-std.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 11:39:00 CEST Received: from moene.org (moene.org [80.101.130.238]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 290963582A1 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 11:38:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=moene.org) by moene.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1YlZi5-00027I-LW; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 11:15:45 +0200 Message-ID: <553A09C1.2080406@moene.org> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 11:15:45 +0200 From: Toon Moene Organization: Moene Computational Physics, Maartensdijk, The Netherlands User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: fortran standards email list for J3 , WG5 Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5472) J3/15-159 - J3 Fortran interp letter ballot #33 - due 24-Apr-2015 References: <20150329164122.D1A7B358119@www.open-std.org> In-Reply-To: <20150329164122.D1A7B358119@www.open-std.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk On 03/29/2015 06:41 PM, Whitlock, Stan wrote: > J3/15-159 > To: J3 Members > From: Stan Whitlock > Subject: J3 Fortran interp letter ballot #33 - due 24-Apr-2015 > Date: 2015 March 29 > The following Fortran interpretations are being balloted: > > Yes No Number Title > > -Y- --- F08/0126 Can cobounds be referenced in the same type > declaration? > > -Y- --- F08/0127 May an initial line begin with a semicolon? > > --- -N- F08/0128 Is recursive USE within a submodule permitted? The discussion that ensued *after* this interp passed the committee indicates to me that we didn't think this through enough. Back to the drawing board, please. > -Y- --- F08/0129 Is CLASS(type) required to refer to a prior type > definition? > > -Y- --- F08/0130 Does coarray allocation sync even with stopped > images? > > -Y- --- F08/0131 Are the changes to C_LOC in the 2010 revision > intentional? > > -Y- --- F08/0132 Can a procedure pointer be declared with an > interface block? > > -Y- --- F08/0133 Is unallocated actual associated with > nonallocatable dummy OK? > > -Y- --- F08/0134 in an image control statement > > -Y- --- F08/0135 Vector subscripted actual makes VALUE dummy > undefinable? > > -Y- --- F08/0136 Argument correspondence with VALUE and > ASYNCHRONOUS > > -Y- --- F08/0137 Result of TRANSFER when MOLD is an array with > element size zero Kind regards, -- Toon Moene - e-mail: toon@moene.org - phone: +31 346 214290 Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands At home: http://moene.org/~toon/; weather: http://moene.org/~hirlam/ Progress of GNU Fortran: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran#news