From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Wed Apr 22 17:43:18 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 682A03582A1; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:43:18 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25081357206 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:43:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Apr 2015 08:42:44 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,624,1422950400"; d="scan'208,217";a="717529644" Received: from orsmsx107.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.240.5]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Apr 2015 08:42:44 -0700 Received: from orsmsx112.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.240.13) by ORSMSX107.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.240.5) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 08:42:43 -0700 Received: from orsmsx103.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.171]) by ORSMSX112.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.12.152]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 08:42:43 -0700 From: "Whitlock, Stan" To: WG5 Subject: RE: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5472) J3/15-159 - J3 Fortran interp letter ballot #33 - due 24-Apr-2015 Thread-Topic: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5472) J3/15-159 - J3 Fortran interp letter ballot #33 - due 24-Apr-2015 Thread-Index: AdB9Ep566WNFaieBQ6qiuoW+dUCazQ== Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 15:42:43 +0000 Message-ID: <4AA982B1265F43408480F737BE12F4D36EB4BFB2@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.22.254.140] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4AA982B1265F43408480F737BE12F4D36EB4BFB2ORSMSX103amrcor_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk --_000_4AA982B1265F43408480F737BE12F4D36EB4BFB2ORSMSX103amrcor_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The following Fortran interpretations are being balloted: Yes No Number Title -Y- --- F08/0126 Can cobounds be referenced in the same type declaration? -Y- --- F08/0127 May an initial line begin with a semicolon? -Y- --- F08/0128 Is recursive USE within a submodule permitted? -Y- --- F08/0129 Is CLASS(type) required to refer to a prior type definition? -Y- --- F08/0130 Does coarray allocation sync even with stopped images? -Y- --- F08/0131 Are the changes to C_LOC in the 2010 revision intentional? -Y- --- F08/0132 Can a procedure pointer be declared with an interface block? -Y- --- F08/0133 Is unallocated actual associated with nonallocatable dummy OK? -Y- --- F08/0134 in an image control statement -Y- --- F08/0135 Vector subscripted actual makes VALUE dummy undefinable? -Y- --- F08/0136 Argument correspondence with VALUE and ASYNCHRONOUS -Y- --- F08/0137 Result of TRANSFER when MOLD is an array with element size zero /Stan Whitlock Intel Corporation --_000_4AA982B1265F43408480F737BE12F4D36EB4BFB2ORSMSX103amrcor_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The following Fortran in= terpretations are being balloted:

 =

Yes  No  = Number    Title

    =             &nb= sp;            =             &nb= sp;            =             &nb= sp;            =             &nb= sp;            =             &nb= sp;            =             &nb= sp;        

-Y- ---  F08/0126&n= bsp; Can cobounds be referenced in the same type

    =              &n= bsp;            = ;   declaration?

-Y-  ---  F08/= 0127  May an initial line begin with a semicolon?

-Y-  ---  F08/= 0128  Is recursive USE within a submodule permitted?=

-Y-  ---  F08/= 0129  Is CLASS(type) required to refer to a prior type

    =              &n= bsp;            = ;   definition?

-Y-  ---  F08/= 0130  Does coarray allocation sync even with stopped=

    =              &n= bsp;            = ;     images?

-Y-  ---  F08/= 0131  Are the changes to C_LOC in the 2010 revision<= /p>

    =              &n= bsp;            = ;    intentional?

-Y-  ---  F08/= 0132  Can a procedure pointer be declared with an

    =              &n= bsp;            = ;    interface block?

-Y-  ---  F08/= 0133  Is unallocated actual associated with

    =              &n= bsp;            = ;       nonallocatable dummy OK?

-Y-  ---  F08/= 0134  <stat-variable> in an image control statement

-Y-  ---  F08/= 0135  Vector subscripted actual makes VALUE dummy

    =              &n= bsp;            = ;     undefinable?

-Y-  ---  F08/= 0136  Argument correspondence with VALUE and

    =              &n= bsp;            = ;    ASYNCHRONOUS

-Y-  ---  F08/= 0137  Result of TRANSFER when MOLD is an array with<= /p>

    =              &n= bsp;            = ;    element size zero

 =

/Stan Whitlock

Intel Corporation

--_000_4AA982B1265F43408480F737BE12F4D36EB4BFB2ORSMSX103amrcor_--