From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Tue Jan 27 10:00:15 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 2E5343587FC; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 10:00:15 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org X-Greylist: delayed 618 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at www5.open-std.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 10:00:13 CET Received: from out.ipsmtp1nec.opaltelecom.net (out.ipsmtp1nec.opaltelecom.net [62.24.202.73]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9DD93567FD for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 10:00:11 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2CVAQBfUMdU/8p3L1ANTQ7QagKBaAEBAQEBhQoBAQQ4QAEQCxgJFg8JAwIBAgFFBgEMAQcCxkOVaAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGI94B4QpAQSNDYwXjWqDPYNTPYMxAQEB X-IPAS-Result: A2CVAQBfUMdU/8p3L1ANTQ7QagKBaAEBAQEBhQoBAQQ4QAEQCxgJFg8JAwIBAgFFBgEMAQcCxkOVaAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGI94B4QpAQSNDYwXjWqDPYNTPYMxAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,473,1418083200"; d="scan'208";a="428398463" Received: from host-80-47-119-202.as13285.net (HELO [192.168.1.4]) ([80.47.119.202]) by out.ipsmtp1nec.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 27 Jan 2015 08:49:50 +0000 Message-ID: <54C7512B.7030209@tiscali.co.uk> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:49:47 +0000 From: John and Alison Reid User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/35.0 SeaMonkey/2.32 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Van.Snyder@jpl.nasa.gov, John Reid CC: JandA.Reid@tiscali.co.uk, WG5 Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5434) WG5 straw ballot 8 on Fortran 2008 interpretations References: <20150126135715.805C83582C7@www.open-std.org> <1422308429.19479.739.camel@math.jpl.nasa.gov> In-Reply-To: <1422308429.19479.739.camel@math.jpl.nasa.gov> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk Van Snyder wrote: > On Mon, 2015-01-26 at 13:57 +0000, John Reid wrote: >> WG5, >> >> Here is a first provisional result of the straw ballot 8 on Fortran 2008 >> interpretations. Have I included your votes correctly? Have I missed any? > > I might have forgotten to reply. On this batch, I would vote yes on all > of them, without comment. Malcolm points out that you voted very early (22 Dec) and that I overlooked your vote. Sorry about that. Shall I ignore this new vote? Cheers, John.