From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Sat Jan 17 14:00:59 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id D7CD7357222; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 14:00:58 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from out.ipsmtp1nec.opaltelecom.net (out.ipsmtp1nec.opaltelecom.net [62.24.202.73]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48DD0356E0D for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 14:00:54 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ar8CALRbulRYaPTL/2dsb2JhbAANTdBRAYFXAQEBAQGGJMR8lHMLAQEBAQEckBaDAIETBallhBCDMgEBAQ X-IPAS-Result: Ar8CALRbulRYaPTL/2dsb2JhbAANTdBRAYFXAQEBAQGGJMR8lHMLAQEBAQEckBaDAIETBallhBCDMgEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,416,1418083200"; d="scan'208";a="409844612" Received: from 88-104-244-203.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (HELO [192.168.1.2]) ([88.104.244.203]) by out.ipsmtp1nec.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 17 Jan 2015 13:00:53 +0000 From: David Muxworthy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: WG5 straw ballot on N2040 Message-Id: <2F264346-A509-465F-81AC-21ADB884FC50@bcs.org.uk> Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 13:00:51 +0000 To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk 3) No, for the following reasons. The timescales specified in N2024 do not allow adequate time for the designs in N2040 to be implemented and proved to be robust and portable before being standardized. I would change my vote if "the next revision=94 on page iv were to be changed to "a future revision=94. David