From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Thu Jan 15 10:18:22 2015
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id A635B35733E; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 10:18:22 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from ppsw-51.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-51.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.151])
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52F553566B9
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 10:18:18 +0100 (CET)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.51]:52061)
	by ppsw-51.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.157]:25)
	with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:nmm1) id 1YBgZG-0005oW-WW (Exim 4.82_3-c0e5623)
	(return-path <nmm1@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:18:18 +0000
Received: from prayer by hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk)
	with local (PRAYER:nmm1) id 1YBgZF-0002iQ-Vu (Exim 4.72)
	(return-path <nmm1@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:18:17 +0000
Received: from [87.114.35.90] by old-webmail.hermes.cam.ac.uk
	with HTTP (Prayer-1.3.5); 15 Jan 2015 09:18:17 +0000
Date: 15 Jan 2015 09:18:17 +0000
From: "N.M. Maclaren" <nmm1@cam.ac.uk>
To: Malcolm Cohen <malcolm@nag-j.co.jp>
Cc: WG5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
Subject: Re: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.5417) RE: J3/14-279: J3 Fortran interp letter
 ballot #32 revised - due 9-Jan-2015
Message-ID: <Prayer.1.3.5.1501150918170.8832@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20150115065725.638E23587E4@www.open-std.org>
References: <20150109170920.37FA9357222@www.open-std.org>
 <20150114193404.745C835733E@www.open-std.org>
 <20150115065725.638E23587E4@www.open-std.org>
X-Mailer: Prayer v1.3.5
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

On Jan 15 2015, Malcolm Cohen wrote:
>>
>>F08/0110
>>
>>(1): I agree with the intent, of course.
>>
>>I cannot see that the new wording excludes code like the following:
>>
>>    INTEGER :: n
>>    READ (UNIT = n+1, IOSTAT = n)
>
>The interp does not modify the first sentence of paragraph 5 as previously 
>modified by Corrigendum 2, which remains:
>  "The value of a specifier in an input/output statement shall not depend 
> on the definition or evaluation of any other specifier in the 
> io-control-spec-list or inquire-spec-list in that statement."
>
> (The interp only modifies - essentially by adding to - the second 
> sentence of paragraph 5 as it resulted from Corrigendum 2.)

Oops.  Yes.  I misread the edits.  So that query disappears.

Thanks for the correction.

Regards,
Nick Maclaren.