From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Fri Dec  5 14:40:24 2014
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id BC64E358736; Fri,  5 Dec 2014 14:40:24 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from out.ipsmtp1nec.opaltelecom.net (out.ipsmtp1nec.opaltelecom.net [62.24.202.73])
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 447C9356E63
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Fri,  5 Dec 2014 14:40:20 +0100 (CET)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqMBAA61gVRQL3fK/2dsb2JhbAANTIc1yw8BAQEBAYUBBCQVGyU2AgUWCwILAwIBAgFLCgMIAoguvyFxkT2FLAwggSiSHYFHBZlfgSKDEpJ6gzIBAQE
X-IPAS-Result: AqMBAA61gVRQL3fK/2dsb2JhbAANTIc1yw8BAQEBAYUBBCQVGyU2AgUWCwILAwIBAgFLCgMIAoguvyFxkT2FLAwggSiSHYFHBZlfgSKDEpJ6gzIBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,522,1413241200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="349396253"
Received: from host-80-47-119-202.as13285.net (HELO [192.168.1.4]) ([80.47.119.202])
  by out.ipsmtp1nec.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 05 Dec 2014 13:40:19 +0000
Message-ID: <5481B5C2.2090105@stfc.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 13:40:18 +0000
From: John Reid <John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:33.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/33.0 SeaMonkey/2.30
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: WG5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
Subject: Vote on TS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

 > Please answer the following question "Is N2033 ready for forwarding to
 > SC22 as the DTS?" in one of these ways.
 >
 > 1) Yes.
 > 2) Yes, but I recommend the following changes.
 > 3) No, for the following reasons.
 > 4) Abstain.


Yes, but I recommend the following changes.

[10:19] Delete "or be the value of a team variable for the initial
team".
Reason. Execution of FORM TEAM is always required.

[10:38], [12:21], [29:34], [34:8], [34:13]. At the end of the sentence
add "since execution last began in this team" (wavy underlined on page
34).
Reason. We need to allow for teams changing during the execution of the
program. At the October meeting, these words were added at [13:5],
[35:26], [35:37], and [36:1].

[13:1] Change "the team" to "team".
Reason. Definite article is wrong here.

[13:5] Remove space before period.

[14:9] Change "detect that an image has stalled" to "manage a stalled
image".
[14:20] After "becomes a stalled image" add ". If the processor does
not have the ability to manage a stalled image, the executing image
becomes a stalled image for the rest of the execution of the program.
If the processor has the ability to manage a stalled image, the
executing image becomes a stalled image"
Reason. I think the intention is to allow implementations not to
support stalled images transferring control to the END TEAM statement.
Stalling will still happen and will need to be permanent.


John.