From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Tue Oct 28 04:07:22 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 2EE15BCA186; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 04:07:20 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (mailhost.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.139.109]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8984435668B for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 04:07:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from [137.79.7.57] (math.jpl.nasa.gov [137.79.7.57]) by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id s9S37Adm015898 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128 bits) verified NO) for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 20:07:13 -0700 Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5350) From a colleague From: Van Snyder Reply-To: Van.Snyder@jpl.nasa.gov To: sc22wg5 In-Reply-To: <1F5E5CF9-A4D1-4173-86A2-B2AF3EAD5744@me.com> References: <20141027201943.09E1A3582F9@www.open-std.org> <51E27519-8C83-4F3C-9D80-3575AAE7D4DF@cray.com> <1414450514.3703.33.camel@math.jpl.nasa.gov> <1F5E5CF9-A4D1-4173-86A2-B2AF3EAD5744@me.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Organization: Yes Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 20:07:10 -0700 Message-ID: <1414465630.3703.162.camel@math.jpl.nasa.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 (2.32.3-30.el6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Source-Sender: Van.Snyder@jpl.nasa.gov X-AUTH: Authorized Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 2014-10-27 at 19:37 -0600, Dan Nagle wrote: > Hi, > > > On Oct 27, 2014, at 16:55 , Van Snyder wrote: > > > And with "support discontinued," how do you revise the code? Put the > > burden on the users of the formerly-supported code, I guess. > > Discontinuing support was penny wise and pound foolish. Three FTE, as > > opposed to 600 people randomly fiddling with their private copies. > > Could you please show the actual error message from compiler > upon encountering the arithmetic if claiming that it cannot be compiled? > > The supplier and version of the compiler would also be helpful > in evaluating the degree of disaster. He didn't write that he was getting diagnostics. He wrote that he "just learned that at least some compilers will no longer support the arithmetic IF statement." I interpret this to mean that he read a press release (or equivalent) from some compiler producer(s) about future plans (if indeed arithmetic IF is removed in 2015). > -- > > Cheers! > Dan Nagle > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > J3 mailing list > J3@mailman.j3-fortran.org > http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3