From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Thu Jul 3 12:45:45 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 2723D35879E; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 12:45:45 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from ppsw-40.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-40.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.140]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF6C735730E for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 12:45:43 +0200 (CEST) X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.51]:50411) by ppsw-40.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.156]:25) with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:nmm1) id 1X2eWM-0008KZ-mG (Exim 4.82_3-c0e5623) (return-path ); Thu, 03 Jul 2014 11:45:43 +0100 Received: from prayer by hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk) with local (PRAYER:nmm1) id 1X2eWM-0007Ez-Ku (Exim 4.72) (return-path ); Thu, 03 Jul 2014 11:45:42 +0100 Received: from [131.111.56.53] by old-webmail.hermes.cam.ac.uk with HTTP (Prayer-1.3.5); 03 Jul 2014 11:45:42 +0100 Date: 03 Jul 2014 11:45:42 +0100 From: "N.M. Maclaren" To: John Reid Cc: sc22wg5@open-std.org Subject: Re: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.5290) Las Vegas minutes Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20140702140302.8B1CC3587FE@www.open-std.org> References: <20140702140302.8B1CC3587FE@www.open-std.org> X-Mailer: Prayer v1.3.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk > 2.4 Appointments for this meeting > The drafting committee would be Reinhold Bader, Daniel Chen, Toon > Moene, David Muxworthy (chair), Steve Lionel and Masayuki Takata. > David Muxworthy would act as secretary and John Reid as librarian. "would be" and "would act" or "was" and "acted"? > 5.5 Liaison Reports: > NCITS/PL22.11 (C): Dan Nagle > Open MP would not incorporate OpenNCC. "Open MP" => "OpenMP" and, as Reinhold says, "OpenNCC" => "OpenACC". > WG23 (Vulnerabilities): Dan Nagle > WG23 had not met since the last WG5 meeting as no meeting had > been called. Upon checking, this appears to be incorrect. Meeting 27 was on 19th-20th September 2013, and that seems to have been the last (though not the last one scheduled) - see http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/plv/. It would be better to change "the last WG5 meeting" to "September 2013". Meeting 27 had an unusual attendance list, with several people present who had not been previously active (some of the ones named in Las Vegas). > Ada contributors had stopped work until the politics had been > resolved. Certain members of the C++ committee were thought to > be the principal motivators in proposing disbandment. Having checked up, it appears that the shenanigans were not public knowledge in SC21, and they also dominate WG14, so it might be unwise to say "C++". It might be better to change "Certain members of the C++ committee were" to "A group of people active in other SC22 working groups but not previously active in WG23". Regards, Nick.