From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Thu Jul  3 02:11:48 2014
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 8DB2E358720; Thu,  3 Jul 2014 02:11:48 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from nag-j.co.jp (nag-j.co.jp [111.68.142.10])
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B0C35689B
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Thu,  3 Jul 2014 02:11:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Maru6 (218-42-159-105.cust.bit-drive.ne.jp [218.42.159.105])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by nag-j.co.jp (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s630BbFr094477
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 09:11:40 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from malcolm@nag-j.co.jp)
Message-ID: <FF483BCD256A4870A60A3673BCE66FC6@Maru6>
From: "Malcolm Cohen" <malcolm@nag-j.co.jp>
To: "sc22wg5" <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
References: <20140702232501.1F2EE35877B@www.open-std.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140702232501.1F2EE35877B@www.open-std.org>
Subject: Re: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.5294) Did we intend to prohibit this?
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 09:11:36 +0900
Organization: =?utf-8?B?5pel5pysTkFH?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="utf-8";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3555.308
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3555.308
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

>As far as I can tell from looking at 7.1.12, the only function from
>IEEE_Arithmetic that's allowed in a constant expression is
>IEEE_Selected_Real_Kind.
>
>Did we intend to prohibit all the others?

Yes.

>Is there a problem with admitting the inquiry functions, and admitting
>the others provided their arguments are constant expressions?

Yes.

Cheers,
-- 
................................Malcolm Cohen, Nihon NAG, Tokyo.
