From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Thu Jul  3 01:25:00 2014
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id E52083587E0; Thu,  3 Jul 2014 01:25:00 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
X-Greylist: delayed 852 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at www5.open-std.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2014 01:25:00 CEST
Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (smtp.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.139.109])
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 172C3358725
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Thu,  3 Jul 2014 01:24:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [137.79.7.57] (math.jpl.nasa.gov [137.79.7.57])
	by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id s62NAdAe001907
	(using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256 bits) verified NO)
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 16:10:41 -0700
Subject: Did we intend to prohibit this?
From: Van Snyder <Van.Snyder@jpl.nasa.gov>
Reply-To: Van.Snyder@jpl.nasa.gov
To: sc22wg5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Organization: Yes
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 16:10:39 -0700
Message-ID: <1404342639.10299.142.camel@math.jpl.nasa.gov>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 (2.32.3-30.el6) 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Source-Sender: Van.Snyder@jpl.nasa.gov
X-AUTH: Authorized
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

As far as I can tell from looking at 7.1.12, the only function from
IEEE_Arithmetic that's allowed in a constant expression is
IEEE_Selected_Real_Kind.

Did we intend to prohibit all the others?

Is there a problem with admitting the inquiry functions, and admitting
the others provided their arguments are constant expressions?