From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Wed Jul 2 22:43:38 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 10666358720; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 22:43:37 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from moene.org (moene.org [80.101.130.238]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C085835725A for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 22:43:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]) by moene.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1X2RNM-00027s-W0; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 22:43:33 +0200 Message-ID: <53B46EF4.1090808@moene.org> Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 22:43:32 +0200 From: Toon Moene Organization: Moene Computational Physics, Maartensdijk, The Netherlands User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: fortran standards email list for J3 , sc22wg5@open-std.org Subject: Country Reports: was: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5290) Las Vegas minutes References: <20140702140302.8B1CC3587FE@www.open-std.org> In-Reply-To: <20140702140302.8B1CC3587FE@www.open-std.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk On 07/02/2014 04:01 PM, John Reid wrote: > Dear all, > > Here are draft minutes of the meeting last week. Comments, please. > > David says he would appreciate some help with section 5. Please feel > free to suggest changes, particularly if you are one of the people who > gave a report. This is a wake up call for me to provide some electronic bits beforehand. David shouldn't have to conclude this from a casual around-the-room-request. I would suggest the following for the Netherlands: "The Programming Languages Committee of the Netherlands meets twice a year, in parallel to SC22 activities. Four language experts are members of the committee, for the following languages: C, C++, Cobol and Fortran. We vote, when requested by ISO, on language specific issues. In that case, the expert at hand explains the issues to the committee, and - after discussion - we vote as seems appropriate. As an example, we voted "agree" on Corrigendum 3 of the Fortran 2008 Standard in our meeting on the 7th of March, 2014, after I explained the major problems addressed in the Corrigendum and the work that had gone into it to fix them. Aside from this regular work, the disbanding of WG23 led to quite some discussion on our mailing list." Thanks, David, for you work ! Hope this helps, -- Toon Moene - e-mail: toon@moene.org - phone: +31 346 214290 Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands At home: http://moene.org/~toon/; weather: http://moene.org/~hirlam/ Progress of GNU Fortran: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran#news