From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Wed Jul 2 20:42:53 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 2075C357257; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 20:42:53 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org X-Greylist: delayed 356 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at www5.open-std.org; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 20:42:52 CEST Received: from postout1.mail.lrz.de (postout1.mail.lrz.de [129.187.255.137]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C40EF35711E for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 20:42:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lxmhs51.srv.lrz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postout1.mail.lrz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3h3WPF0065zySr; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 20:36:48 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: postout.lrz.de (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)" header.d=lrz.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=lrz.de; h= mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type :content-language:accept-language:in-reply-to:references :message-id:date:date:subject:subject:from:from:received :received:received; s=postout; t=1404326208; bh=BsKORdPh8F2DO6W4 gFgp9wxe1pGajWugKuA8mzrwP9k=; b=ZDOs1VNs+MlbLZJsbsnLFRcGtM0XDM3Y EXF6KBad01TP9l7w8JBLd64iutkd0uwf3fPHQKe+FTfii+dpWilCiSu7DpCUbX7V yLFQUOkBVkVGyVLCGseOD/cljOLtivSblN3MpNu2y7nzUsOnEYLE5F8MGSxcVRIj 4418ye7z7wbxFC/e0dYFNoVWmOIjTxkix8OiT8o8KT67xbl+qhQ3qNOkAJIZkuH1 zb5vsj5PgiItnRXY9w1FQWbDKzYxRTVUID8692NULmBmHPCEEdbUCbWIuQeyOJOt XK2+DY5ziBp/9RXhZA4ZM9BVCI4xBuBeYj90wu1UJzpPB4pZ104xYw== X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at lrz.de in lxmhs51.srv.lrz.de X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.896 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, LRZ_HAS_X_ORIG_IP=0.001, LRZ_MSGID_MSOE_6=0.001, LRZ_MSGID_MS_EX=0.001, LRZ_MSGID_SPAM_68=0.001] autolearn=no Received: from postout1.mail.lrz.de ([127.0.0.1]) by lxmhs51.srv.lrz.de (lxmhs51.srv.lrz.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 20024) with LMTP id ehfDd09l6VPY; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 20:36:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from BADWLRZ-SWHBT1.ads.mwn.de (BADWLRZ-SWHBT1.ads.mwn.de [IPv6:2001:4ca0:0:108::125]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "BADWLRZ-SWHBT1", Issuer "BADWLRZ-SWHBT1" (not verified)) by postout1.mail.lrz.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3h3WPD3zmBzySp; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 20:36:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from BADWLRZ-SWMBX11.ads.mwn.de ([fe80::6de5:ff8b:1900:b1a1]) by BADWLRZ-SWHBT1.ads.mwn.de ([fe80::e42f:e9f5:bde9:f99b%16]) with mapi id 14.03.0181.006; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 20:36:44 +0200 From: "Bader, Reinhold" To: John Reid , "sc22wg5@open-std.org" Subject: AW: (SC22WG5.5290) Las Vegas minutes Thread-Topic: (SC22WG5.5290) Las Vegas minutes Thread-Index: AQHPlf5b/pQkImi7jUmH67PgcfBDNpuNGdGw Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 18:36:43 +0000 Message-ID: <166ED263DF83324D9A3BA67FB6772B2B5A20204D@BADWLRZ-SWMBX11.ads.mwn.de> References: <20140702140302.8B1CC3587FE@www.open-std.org> In-Reply-To: <20140702140302.8B1CC3587FE@www.open-std.org> Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US Content-Language: de-DE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [2001:4ca0:0:f031::2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk Hello John, David,=20 In 5.5 there is "Open MP would not incorporate OpenNCC" --> OpenNCC must presumably read OpenACC --> "not incorporate" seems to categorical; how about "not incorporate all = of"? Further, "OpenMP 4.10 would be out in April 2015." I think must read "The OpenMP 4.0 standard will be fully supported in gfortran 4.10, due for = April 2015." (I may be misremembering this, however if the sentence does really refer to= the=20 OpenMP standard, it would be 4.1, not 4.10) Cheers,=20 Reinhold > -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- > Von: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org [mailto:owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org] Im > Auftrag von John Reid > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 2. Juli 2014 16:03 > An: sc22wg5@open-std.org > Betreff: (SC22WG5.5290) Las Vegas minutes >=20 > Dear all, >=20 > Here are draft minutes of the meeting last week. Comments, please. >=20 > David says he would appreciate some help with section 5. Please feel > free to suggest changes, particularly if you are one of the people who > gave a report. >=20 > Thanks, David, for providing us with such an excellent first draft. >=20 > Cheers, >=20 > John. >=20 > -- > Scanned by iCritical.