From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Thu Jun 19 19:21:22 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id A18DC357122; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 19:21:22 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from st11p02mm-asmtp002.mac.com (st11p02mm-asmtpout002.mac.com [17.172.220.237]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 549273570D4 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 19:21:20 +0200 (CEST) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Received: from [128.117.138.42] (unknown [128.117.138.42]) by st11p02mm-asmtp002.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.08(7.0.4.27.7) 64bit (built Aug 22 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0N7F007YTEVD5R80@st11p02mm-asmtp002.mac.com> for sc22wg5@open-std.org; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 17:21:14 +0000 (GMT) From: Dan Nagle Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Subject: proper papers Message-id: <25EBCC5F-9A5A-4AB2-AE6B-8E026EE817EA@me.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 11:21:11 -0600 To: WG5 List X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2) X-MANTSH: 1TEIXWV4bG1oaGkdHB0lGUkdDRl5PWBoaGxEKTEMXGx0EGx0YBBIZBBsTEBseGh8 aEQpYTRdLEQptfhcaEQpMWRcbGhsbEQpZSRcRClleF2NjeREKQ04XSxseGmJCH2lpH29TGXhzB x9gGx0YG28SEQpFQxcWGB9vaGlpH2wHE2sfawcea2gYB2tvHGgHEm8aGBxvbxIbHW9rakdPBEl FRxQRClhcFxkEGgQbHgdNThwTGhodEwUbHQQbHRgEEhkEGxMQGx4aHxsRCl5ZF2EYZ2lGEQpDW hcbGBIEGxsdBBsZEgQeGBEKQkUXYkVQX3pwEnhyZUcRCkJOF2xwYHlAHWJSaRpiEQpCTBdkQk5 JG2hPThxtehEKQmwXZGR+eGsZaHtaQ1IRCkJAF2RQX2hyfEtSflNNEQpCWBdoU0caE2wZTX9pf hEKcGgXY3JNWFIYSW94ek4RCnBoF2JDbV1yekZNXlkYEQpwaBdsZEYFWEJuTFsFfREKcGgXZWR wc158UkhcYF0RCnBoF2lPbWtLWl5GH0NJEQpwbBdgSH9LSVBJElJ9XREKcEwXaRt9WllCe0Rye 1wR X-CLX-Spam: false X-CLX-Score: 1011 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.12.52,1.0.14,0.0.0000 definitions=2014-06-19_04:2014-06-19,2014-06-19,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1402240000 definitions=main-1406190208 Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk Hi, Several papers for 204 are violating the =93one topic or one claus=94 = rule. This makes assignment to subgroup difficult. It also increases the chance that heads of subgroup will lose a topic that ought to be addressed due to not-quite-understood horse-trading during heat of the meeting, or waste time addressing a topic that another subgroup is addressing. Please keep to the =93one topic or one claus=94 rule. No one wants a topic dropped in the midst of a meeting! And we have a lot of work next week so let=92s avoid dueling edits. TIA -- Cheers! Dan Nagle -- Cheers! Dan Nagle