From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Thu Jun 12 20:06:36 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id C2AA2357246; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 20:06:36 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from moene.org (moene.org [80.101.130.238]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8117935698F for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 20:06:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]) by moene.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1Wv9ON-0005mT-C3; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 20:06:27 +0200 Message-ID: <5399EC23.9030704@moene.org> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 20:06:27 +0200 From: Toon Moene Organization: Moene Computational Physics, Maartensdijk, The Netherlands User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: fortran standards email list for J3 , WG5 CC: "Whitlock, Stan" Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5239) J3 Fortran interp letter ballot #30 - due 13-Jun-2014 References: <20140508012644.679DF3586F5@www.open-std.org> In-Reply-To: <20140508012644.679DF3586F5@www.open-std.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk On 05/08/2014 03:26 AM, Whitlock, Stan wrote: [ Just in case Karla, to whom I am an alternate, doesn't vote ] > 8 Fortran interpretations are currently "Passed by J3 meeting" after > > J3 meeting #203. This is the letter ballot phase to go from "Passed > > by J3 meeting" to "Passed by J3 letter ballot". > > The following Fortran interpretations are being balloted: > > Yes No Number Title > > -Y- --- F08/0099 VOLATILE in specification expressions > > -Y- --- F08/0100 IMPORT statement and prior explicit declaration > > -Y- --- F08/0101 NAMELIST and multiple occurrences of a variable > > -Y- --- F08/0102 MERGE and polymorphism > > -Y- --- F08/0103 Pointers to internal procedures with different host > instances > > -Y- --- F08/0104 IEEE Inquiry Functions > > --- -N- F08/0105 Is the ASYNCHRONOUS attribute allowed with the > VALUE attribute? > > -Y- --- F08/0106 MOVE_ALLOC for a remote array F08/0105 Is the ASYNCHRONOUS attribute allowed with the VALUE attribute? Allowing this would make the meaning of the program depend on when the processor decides to make the copy inherent in the VALUE attribute. This seems a dangerous introduction of non-determinism in the Standard to me. Kind regards, -- Toon Moene - e-mail: toon@moene.org - phone: +31 346 214290 Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands At home: http://moene.org/~toon/; weather: http://moene.org/~hirlam/ Progress of GNU Fortran: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran#news