From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Wed Apr 23 09:17:18 2014
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id E8344358484; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 09:17:18 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from nag-j.co.jp (nag-j.co.jp [111.68.142.10])
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C33CE356741
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 09:17:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Maru6 (218-42-159-105.cust.bit-drive.ne.jp [218.42.159.105])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by nag-j.co.jp (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s3N7HB06016633
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 16:17:14 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from malcolm@nag-j.co.jp)
Message-ID: <C11B9F479CEF44B99428AF828CFB6919@Maru6>
From: "Malcolm Cohen" <malcolm@nag-j.co.jp>
To: "WG5" <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
References: <534F9B1B.6090704@stfc.ac.uk> <20140422120812.E37F2356867@www.open-std.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140422120812.E37F2356867@www.open-std.org>
Subject: Re: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.5236) Ballot result
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 16:17:10 +0900
Organization: =?UTF-8?B?5pel5pysTkFH?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="UTF-8";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3555.308
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3555.308
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

John Reid wrote:
> I would like to ask J3 to prepare a revised version for approval by WG5
> at the end of the June meeting without a further ballot.
...
>No-one has objected this idea, so I have added a paragraph to this effect.

Although approval by WG5 at the end of the June meeting is a laudable aim, I 
don't think we should commit to that (nor did I think I needed to object).  If 
we reach consensus early enough in the meeting, and have a final document in our 
hands by Wednesday night (or maybe Thursday 9am at the very very latest), it 
*might* be achievable.  Otherwise we won't have time to read it properly.  It's 
more important to get it right than to get it out.

Cheers,
-- 
................................Malcolm Cohen, Nihon NAG, Tokyo. 

