From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Thu Apr 10 11:14:05 2014
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 18C053568D6; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 11:14:05 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
X-Greylist: delayed 3603 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at www5.open-std.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 11:14:04 CEST
Received: from out.ipsmtp4nec.opaltelecom.net (out.ipsmtp4nec.opaltelecom.net [62.24.202.76])
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2DDE356679
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 11:14:02 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBAEt6RVNYaPMA/2dsb2JhbAANTMglgTeDGQEBAQMBOkQLC0ZXGYd0qWGjSheOcxaDDoEUBK5R
X-IPAS-Result: ApMBAEt6RVNYaPMA/2dsb2JhbAANTMglgTeDGQEBAQMBOkQLC0ZXGYd0qWGjSheOcxaDDoEUBK5R
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,827,1389744000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="120009835"
Received: from 88-104-243-0.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (HELO [192.168.1.2]) ([88.104.243.0])
  by out.ipsmtp4nec.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 09 Apr 2014 17:56:04 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.5213) WG23 for extinction ...
From: David Muxworthy <d.muxworthy@bcs.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20140405113440.8329C3586A2@www.open-std.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 17:56:04 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <A6E5A2DB-F10E-4765-AB9F-69FB0D21AA2A@bcs.org.uk>
References: <20140405113440.8329C3586A2@www.open-std.org>
To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

On 5 Apr 2014, at 12:10, Toon Moene <toon@moene.org> wrote:

> How should I advise to vote ?

For what it is worth, it seems likely that the UK will vote against
closing WG23 on the grounds that its work is not complete and that
it still has a contribution to make.

David

